|
|
United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141 (1975)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141 (1975)
United States v. Bisceglia No. 73-1245 Argued November 11-12, 1974 Decided February 19, 1975 420 U.S. 141
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) held to have authority under §§ 7601 and 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 to issue a "John Doe" summons to a bank or other depository to discover the identity of a person who has had bank transactions suggesting the possibility of liability for unpaid taxes, in this instance, a summons to respondent bank officer during an investigation to identify the person or persons who deposited 400 deteriorated $100 bills with the bank within the space of a few weeks. Pp. 148-151.
(a) That the summons was styled in a fictitious name is not a sufficient ground for denying enforcement. Pp. 148-149.
(b) The language of § 7601 permitting the IRS to investigate and inquire after "all persons . . . who may be liable to pay any internal revenue tax . . ." and of § 7602 authorizing the summoning of "any person" for the taking of testimony and examination of books and witnesses that may be relevant for "ascertaining the correctness of any return, . . . determining the liability of any person . . . or collecting any such liability . . . " is inconsistent with an interpretation that would limit the issuance of summonses to investigations which have already focused upon a particular return, a particular named person, or a particular potential tax liability, and, moreover, such a reading of the summons power of the IRS ignores the agency’s legitimate interest in large or unusual financial transactions, especially those involving cash. Pp. 149-150.
486 F.2d 706, reversed and remanded.
BURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BRENNAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which POWELL, J., joined, post, p. 151. STEWART, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which DOUGLAS, J., joined, post, p. 152.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141 (1975) in 420 U.S. 141 420 U.S. 142. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZMRVRC759XVT24E.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141 (1975), in 420 U.S. 141, page 420 U.S. 142. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZMRVRC759XVT24E.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141 (1975). cited in 1975, 420 U.S. 141, pp.420 U.S. 142. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZMRVRC759XVT24E.
|