|
United States v. Fruehauf, 365 U.S. 146 (1961)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Fruehauf, 365 U.S. 146 (1961)
United States v. Fruehauf No. 91 Argued January 11, 1961 Decided February 20, 1961 365 U.S. 146
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
Several employers were indicted in substantially the language of the statute for violating § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, by paying and delivering a sum of money to the president of a labor organization representing some of their employees who were engaged in an industry affecting commerce; and the president of the labor organization was indicted, substantially in the language of the statute, for having received and accepted the sum of money from the employers. The District Judge ruled that a trial memorandum filed by the Government constituted a judicial admission that the transaction was a loan, and he dismissed the indictment on the ground that the statute did not apply to a loan. The Government appealed directly to this Court under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, and the sole question presented in its jurisdictional statement was "whether a loan of money comes within the . . . prohibitions" of § 302. After argument, the Solicitor General made representations to the Court which indicated that he considered the Government free, in the event of remand, to prove under the indictment that the transaction came within the statute by virtue of its particular facts, from which it might have been found that it lacked various characteristics of a bona fide loan.
Held: inasmuch as the record before this Court presents only an abstract question, the ruling dismissing the indictment is set aside, and the case is remanded for trial upon the indictment. Pp. 147-159.
Judgment set aside and case remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Fruehauf, 365 U.S. 146 (1961) in 365 U.S. 146 365 U.S. 147. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZLWZAKIV2RCA4MX.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Fruehauf, 365 U.S. 146 (1961), in 365 U.S. 146, page 365 U.S. 147. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZLWZAKIV2RCA4MX.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Fruehauf, 365 U.S. 146 (1961). cited in 1961, 365 U.S. 146, pp.365 U.S. 147. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZLWZAKIV2RCA4MX.
|