|
United States Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 481 (1936)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 481 (1936)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 296 U.S. 463, click here.
United States Trust Company of New York v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue No. 169 Argued December 17, 1935 Decided January 6, 1936 296 U.S. 481
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
A trust created by a father for his three children, providing, inter alia, that each of them should receive one-third of the net income and, upon termination of the trust, one-third of the principal of the trust estate, was amended, as permitted by the indenture, to declare that the estate should be divided into three separate and equal shares, to which might be assigned undivided interests in the whole or any part of it; that such shares should be designated by the respective names of the three beneficiaries, and that each of the beneficiaries should have the same rights, interest, and power in and over his share and the income thereof as was given to them, respectively, by the original trust instrument over one-third of the trust estate. The object of the amendment was to divide the trust into three separate trusts in order to reduce liability for income taxes. The cash and property of the trust were accordingly transferred on the books of the trustee, in equal shares, to three new accounts, one for each of the beneficiaries; income, disbursements, and new principal were entered in this same way, and the accounts of the single trust were closed.
Held:
1. That the single trust had been converted into three in accordance with the intention of the parties. P. 486.
2. It was not necessary that the cash and securities should be physically divided. P. 487.
3. Any vested property right, including an undivided interest, may constitute the corpus of a trust; a single fund may be held on several trusts. P. 487.
75 F.2d 973 reversed.
Certiorari to review a judgment reversing an order of the Board of Tax Appeals which set aside an additional tax imposed on a trustee by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 481 (1936) in 296 U.S. 481 296 U.S. 482. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZAXZXYIEYTWLB1F.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 481 (1936), in 296 U.S. 481, page 296 U.S. 482. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZAXZXYIEYTWLB1F.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 481 (1936). cited in 1936, 296 U.S. 481, pp.296 U.S. 482. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=ZAXZXYIEYTWLB1F.
|