|
Show Summary
Hide Summary
Historical SummaryThe Virginia resolutions of 1798 and the Kentucky resolutions of 1798 and 1799 were outcomes of the discussion over the alien and sedition laws. The legislature of Kentucky met Nov. 7, 1798, and on the following day John Breckinridge introduced in the House a set of resolutions, the original draft of which had been prepared by Jefferson. The resolutions, with amendments, were adopted by the House on the 10th; on the 13th the Senate concurred, and on the 16th the resolutions received the approval of the governor. A set of resolutions prepared by Madison, then a member of the Virginia legislature, was presented in that body Dec. 13, 1798, by John Taylor. The resolutions were debated until the 21st, when, by a vote of 100 to 63, they were adopted; on the 24th they passed the Senate, the vote being 14 to 3, and were approved by the governor. Copies of each set of resolutions were transmitted to the governors of the various States to be laid before the legislatures. Replies were made by the legislatures of New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, and Delaware, and in each case were "decidedly unfavorable." In 1799 Kentucky reaffirmed its adherence to the doctrine of the resolutions of 1798, and added another resolution. In Virginia the replies of the State legislatures were referred to a committee, of which Madison was chairman, which made an elaborate report Jan. 7, 1800. REFERENCES. — For the texts, see under each set of resolutions, following. The answers of the State legislatures are in Elliot’s (ed. 1836), IV., 558–565, where are also Madison’s report of 1800, and extracts from an "address to the people" accompanying the Virginia resolutions. Madison’s report is also in his (ed. 1865), IV., 515–555; see also various letters of Madison, ib. II., 151–156; IV, 95–111. Warfield’s is of special importance; cf. review in , XLV., 528, 529, and correspondence in ib., XLIV., 382–384, 467, 468. REFERENCES. — Text in Elliot’s (ed. 1836), IV., 570–572. Corrections of a number of obvious typographical errors are enclosed in square brackets. The formal endorsements at the end are omitted.
No. 64.
Kentucky Resolutions
November 22, 1799
* * * * * * * *
The representatives of the good people of this Commonwealth, in General Assembly convened, having maturely considered the answers of sundry States in the Union, to their resolutions passed the last session, respecting certain unconstitutional laws of Congress, commonly called the Alien and Sedition Laws, would be faithless, indeed, to themselves and to those they represent, were they silently to acquiesce in the principles and doctrines attempted to be maintained in all those answers, that of Virginia only excepted. To again enter the field of argument, and attempt more fully or forcibly to expose the unconstitutionality of those obnoxious laws, would, it is apprehended, be as unnecessary as unavailing. We cannot, however, but lament, that, in the discussion of those interesting subjects, by sundry of the Legislatures of our sister States, unfounded suggestions, and uncandid insinuations, derogatory to the true character and principles of this Commonwealth has been substituted in place of fair reasoning and sound argument. Our opinions of these alarming measures of the General Government, together with our reasons for those opinions, were detailed with decency, and with temper, and submitted to the discussion and judgment of our fellow-citizens throughout the Union. Whether the like decency and temper have been observed in the answers of most of those States, who have denied or attempted to obviate the great truths contained in those resolutions, we have now only to submit to a candid world. Faithful to the true principles of the federal Union, unconscious of any designs to disturb the harmony of that Union, and anxious only to escape the fangs of despotism, the good people of this Commonwealth are regardless of censure or calumniation. Least [Lest], however, the silence of this Commonwealth should be construed into an acquiescence in the doctrines and principles advanced and attempted to be maintained by the said answers, or at least those of our fellow-citizens throughout the Union who so widely differ from us on those important subjects, should be deluded by the expectation, that we shall be deterred from what we conceive our duty, or shrink from the principles contained in those resolutions — therefore,
Resolved, That this Commonwealth considers the Federal Union, upon the terms and for the purposes specified in the late compact, conducive to the liberty and happiness of the several States: That it does now unequivocally declare its attachment to the Union, and to that compact, agreeably to its obvious and real intention, and will be among the last to seek its dissolution: That if those who administer the General Government be permitted to transgress the limits fixed by that compact, by a total disregard to the special delegations of power therein contained, an annihilation of the State Governments, and the creation upon their ruins of a General Consolidated Government, will be the inevitable consequence: That the principle and construction contended for by sundry of the state legislatures, that the General Government is the exclusive judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it, stop nothing [short] of despotism — since the discretion of those who administer the government, and not the Constitution, would be the measure of their powers: That the several states who formed that instrument being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of the infraction; and, That a Nullification by those sovereignties, of all unauthorized acts done under color of that instrument is the rightful remedy: That this Commonwealth does, under the most deliberate reconsideration, declare, that the said Alien and Sedition Laws are, in their opinion, palpable violations of the said Constitution; and, however cheerfully it may be disposed to surrender its opinion to a majority of its sister states, in matters of ordinary or doubtful policy, yet, in no [omit] momentous regulations like the present, which so vitally wound the best rights of the citizen, it would consider a silent acquiescence as highly criminal: That although this commonwealth, as a party to the federal compact, will bow to the laws of the Union, yet, it does, at the same [time] declare, that it will not now, or ever hereafter, cease to oppose in a constitutional manner, every attempt at what quarter soever offered, to violate that compact. And, finally, in order that no pretext or arguments may be drawn from a supposed acquiescence, on the part of this Commonwealth in the constitutionality of those laws, and be thereby used as precedents for similar future violations of the Federal compact — this Commonwealth does now enter against them its solemn PROTEST.
Chicago: Elliot, ed., Debates in Documentary Source Book of American History, 1606-1913, ed. William MacDonald (1863-1938) (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1916), 277–278. Original Sources, accessed April 11, 2025, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YZA17823ZGAQMNQ.
MLA: . Debates, edited by Elliot, Vol. IV, in Documentary Source Book of American History, 1606-1913, edited by William MacDonald (1863-1938), New York, The Macmillan Company, 1916, pp. 277–278. Original Sources. 11 Apr. 2025. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YZA17823ZGAQMNQ.
Harvard: (ed.), Debates. cited in 1916, Documentary Source Book of American History, 1606-1913, ed. , The Macmillan Company, New York, pp.277–278. Original Sources, retrieved 11 April 2025, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YZA17823ZGAQMNQ.
|