Huddleston v. Dwyer, 322 U.S. 232 (1944)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Huddleston v. Dwyer, 322 U.S. 232 (1944)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 322 U.S. 213, click here.
Huddleston v. Dwyer No. 628 Argued April 25, 1944 Decided May 15, 1944 322 U.S. 232
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. It is the duty of the federal appellate courts, as well as the trial court, to ascertain and apply the state law where that law controls the decision. P. 236.
2. A judgment of a federal court in a case ruled by state law, correctly applying that law as authoritatively declared by the state courts when the judgment was rendered, must be reversed on appellate review if, in the meantime, the state courts have disapproved their former rulings and adopted different ones. P. 236.
3. This Court ordinarily will not decide questions of state law which may conveniently be decided first by the court whose judgment is here on review. P. 237.
4. Upon review here of a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals in a case in which the decision is controlled by state law, it appears that a decision of the highest court of the State, rendered subsequently to those on which the Circuit Court of Appeals relied, has at least raised such doubt as to the applicable state law as to require its reexamination. The judgment therefore is vacated, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of the subsequent state court decision. P. 236.
137 F.2d 383 vacated.
Certiorari, 321 U.S. 759, to review the affirmance of an order directing a levy of taxes to provide funds for the payment of respondent bondholders.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Huddleston v. Dwyer, 322 U.S. 232 (1944) in 322 U.S. 232 322 U.S. 233. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YXVGEHLSYSAC441.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Huddleston v. Dwyer, 322 U.S. 232 (1944), in 322 U.S. 232, page 322 U.S. 233. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YXVGEHLSYSAC441.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Huddleston v. Dwyer, 322 U.S. 232 (1944). cited in 1944, 322 U.S. 232, pp.322 U.S. 233. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YXVGEHLSYSAC441.
|