Conley v. Ballinger, 216 U.S. 84 (1910)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Conley v. Ballinger, 216 U.S. 84 (1910)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 216 U.S. 78, click here.
Conley v. Ballinger No. 77 Argued January 14, 1910 Decided January 31, 1910 216 U.S. 84
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Syllabus
There is no question as to the complete legislative power of the United States over the land of the Wyandotte Indians while it remained in their occupation, and parcels excepted from the general distribution under the Treaty of 1855 continued under such legislative control for the benefit of the tribe.
While the United States maintains and protects Indian use of land and its occupation against others, it is bound itself only by honor, and not by law, and it will not be presumed to have abandoned at any time its attitude of protection towards its wards. Nor is its good faith broken by any change in disposition of property believed by Congress to be for the welfare of the Indians.
Even if a suit to enjoin disposition of property reserved by the Treaty of 1855 with the Wyandottes for cemetery use is not a suit against the United States, a descendant of an Indian buried in such cemetery cannot maintain such an action to enjoin the disposition of the reserved property in accordance with an act of Congress.
In view of the circumstances of this case, it is proper to dismiss the bill without costs under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1875, c. 137, § 5.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Conley v. Ballinger, 216 U.S. 84 (1910) in 216 U.S. 84 216 U.S. 85–216 U.S. 88. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YV1BY2VENWUIYWT.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Conley v. Ballinger, 216 U.S. 84 (1910), in 216 U.S. 84, pp. 216 U.S. 85–216 U.S. 88. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YV1BY2VENWUIYWT.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Conley v. Ballinger, 216 U.S. 84 (1910). cited in 1910, 216 U.S. 84, pp.216 U.S. 85–216 U.S. 88. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=YV1BY2VENWUIYWT.
|