Ohio Ex Rel. Clark v. Deckebach, 274 U.S. 392 (1927)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ohio Ex Rel. Clark v. Deckebach, 274 U.S. 392 (1927)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 274 U.S. 387, click here.
Ohio ex Rel. Clark v. Deckebach No. 272 Argued April 18, 19, 1927 Decided May 16, 1927 274 U.S. 392
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF OHIO
1. Construction of the pleadings by the state supreme court as sufficiently drawing in question the validity of an ordinance under a treaty will be followed by this Court on review of the judgment upholding the ordinance. P. 394.
2. The provision of the Treaty with Great Britain (July 3, 1815, August 6, 1827) that "the merchants and traders of each nation . . . shall enjoy the most complete protection and security for their commerce" does not apply to proprietors of places of amusement, like a billiard hall. P. 395.
3. A city ordinance prohibiting the issuance to alien of licenses to conduct pool and billiard room does not violate the right of aliens under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. So held in view of the character of the business, and the absence of ground for concluding that the legislative council acted without a rational basis in determining that aliens as a class were disqualified by their associations, experiences, and interests from conducting the business, and in excluding the entire class, rather than its objectionable member selected by more empirical method. P. 396.
113 Oh.St. 347 affirmed.
Error to a judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus to require the Auditor of Cincinnati to issue a license to Clarke, the petitioner.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ohio Ex Rel. Clark v. Deckebach, 274 U.S. 392 (1927) in 274 U.S. 392 274 U.S. 393. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Y42UZDU9ZX6Z7G4.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ohio Ex Rel. Clark v. Deckebach, 274 U.S. 392 (1927), in 274 U.S. 392, page 274 U.S. 393. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Y42UZDU9ZX6Z7G4.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ohio Ex Rel. Clark v. Deckebach, 274 U.S. 392 (1927). cited in 1927, 274 U.S. 392, pp.274 U.S. 393. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Y42UZDU9ZX6Z7G4.
|