|
Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. V Henneford, 305 U.S. 434 (1939)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. V Henneford, 305 U.S. 434 (1939)
Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v Henneford No. 75 Argued November 10, 1938 Decided January 3, 1939 305 U.S. 434
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASINGTON
Syllabus
A state tax measured by the gross receipts of the taxpayer from his business of marketing fruit shipped from the State to the places of sale in other States and foreign countries, held a burden on interstate and foreign commerce prohibited by the commerce clause of the Constitution. P. 436.
The business was that of a marketing agent for a federation of fruit growers. The agent, with the aid of numerous representatives without the State, sold the fruit to purchasers in other States and in foreign countries, for prices fixed by the principal, collected and accounted for the proceeds, and was paid at so much per box. The tax, though nominally imposed upon the agent’s activities in Washington, is not apportioned to those activities, but is measured, like the compensation taxed, upon the entire interstate commerce service rendered, both within and without the State, and burdens that commerce in direct proportion to its volume. If Washington is free to exact such a tax, other States to which the commerce extends may, with equal right, lay a tax similarly measured for the privilege of conducting within their respective territorial limits the activities there which contribute to the service.
193 Wash. 451, 75 P.2d 1017, reversed.
Appeal from a judgment affirming a judgment dismissing on the merits a bill to enjoin members of the State Tax Commission of Washington from collecting a tax on the "business activities" of the plaintiff appellant.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. V Henneford, 305 U.S. 434 (1939) in 305 U.S. 434 305 U.S. 435. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XMJ85HTNIVEHKXI.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. V Henneford, 305 U.S. 434 (1939), in 305 U.S. 434, page 305 U.S. 435. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XMJ85HTNIVEHKXI.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. V Henneford, 305 U.S. 434 (1939). cited in 1939, 305 U.S. 434, pp.305 U.S. 435. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XMJ85HTNIVEHKXI.
|