|
|
United States v. Kales, 314 U.S. 186 (1941)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Kales, 314 U.S. 186 (1941)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 314 U.S. 160, click here.
United States v. Kales No. 35 Argued November 14, 1941 Decided December 8, 1941 314 U.S. 186
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. A taxpayer who had paid a 1919 income tax on the profits of a sale of stock computed on the basis of a March 1, 1913, valuation of the stock sold, and who later had been subjected by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to a jeopardy assessment for an additional tax on the profits of the same transaction computed upon a lower 1913 valuation, paid the additional tax and accompanied the payment with a letter protesting against it upon the ground that the Commissioner had no authority to reopen and set aside the 1913 valuation as made by his predecessor, but also asserting that the first 1913 valuation was itself too low, and that, if it were to be set aside by administrative action, or in the courts, the taxpayer would insist that the earlier tax was therefore excessive, and would claim a refund of the excess paid. Held, that the letter sufficed as a claim to stay the running of the statute of limitations on the taxpayer’s right to a refund of an excess in the earlier tax. P. 193.
2. A notice fairly advising the Commissioner of the nature of the taxpayer’s claim, which the Commissioner could reject because too general or because it does not comply with formal requirements of the statute and regulations, will nevertheless be treated as a claim where formal defects and lack of specificity have been remedied by amendment filed after the lapse of the statutory period. This is especially the case where such a claim has not misled the Commissioner and he has accepted and treated it as such. P. 194.
3. Treatment by the taxing authorities of the informal claim and its later amendment as a claim for refund operated as a waiver of regulations prescribing the formality and particularity with which grounds for a refund are required to be stated. P. 196.
4. A judgment against a Collector of Internal Revenue refunding 1919 income taxes collected by him in 1925 does not bar a later suit against the United States to recover an excess of tax on income for the same year, paid to a different Collector in 1920. P. 197.
115 F.2d 497 affirmed.
Certiorari, 313 U.S. 553, to review a judgment reversing a dismissal by the District Court of a suit against the United States for refund of overpaid 1919 income taxes. The Collector to whom the payment was made had retired from office and had died before the suit was begun.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Kales, 314 U.S. 186 (1941) in 314 U.S. 186 314 U.S. 187–314 U.S. 189. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XBUYRUFVDNIAFC6.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Kales, 314 U.S. 186 (1941), in 314 U.S. 186, pp. 314 U.S. 187–314 U.S. 189. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XBUYRUFVDNIAFC6.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Kales, 314 U.S. 186 (1941). cited in 1941, 314 U.S. 186, pp.314 U.S. 187–314 U.S. 189. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XBUYRUFVDNIAFC6.
|