|
|
Macfadden v. United States, 213 U.S. 288 (1909)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Macfadden v. United States, 213 U.S. 288 (1909)
Macfadden v. United States No. 14 Original Submitted April 5, 1909 Decided April 12, 1909 213 U.S. 288
APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Syllabus
The object of the Act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat. 826, was to distribute the appellate jurisdiction of this Court between it and the circuit court of appeals, and to abolish the appellate jurisdiction of the circuit court.
Although where a real constitutional question exists, a writ of error can be sued out directly from this Court to the trial court under § 5 of the act of 1891, the right to do so is lost by taking an appeal to the circuit court of appeals. Robinson v. Caldwell, 165 U.S. 359.
The circuit court of appeals does not lose its jurisdiction of an appeal under § 6 of the act of 1891 because questions were involved which would have warranted a direct appeal to this Court under § 5 of that act.
Where the case can be taken directly to this Court under § 5, or to the circuit court of appeals under § 6, and the latter appeal is taken, while a writ of error will lie to the circuit court of appeals if the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court rests, as shown by plaintiff’s statement, on grounds, one of which is reviewable by this Court, it will not lie if the only ground of jurisdiction is one where the judgment of the circuit court of appeals is final.
The judgment of the circuit court of appeals in a criminal case is final, and is no less so because the appellate jurisdiction of this Court might have been invoked directly under § 5 of the act of 1891.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Macfadden v. United States, 213 U.S. 288 (1909) in 213 U.S. 288 213 U.S. 291. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XBLBYZXIQJQ6ME4.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Macfadden v. United States, 213 U.S. 288 (1909), in 213 U.S. 288, page 213 U.S. 291. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XBLBYZXIQJQ6ME4.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Macfadden v. United States, 213 U.S. 288 (1909). cited in 1909, 213 U.S. 288, pp.213 U.S. 291. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=XBLBYZXIQJQ6ME4.
|