|
|
United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (1997)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (1997)
United States v. Watts No. 95-1906 Decided January 6, 1997 519 U.S. 148
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Respondent Watts was convicted of possessing cocaine base with intent to distribute, but acquitted of using a firearm in relation to a drug offense. Despite this, the District Court found by a peponderance of the evidence that Watts possessed guns in connection with the drug offense, and therefore added two points to his base offense level when calculating his sentence under the United State Sentencing Guidelines. In a separate case, respondent Putra was convicted of aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine on May 8, 1992, but acquitted of aiding and abetting such a transaction on May 9. Finding by a preponderance of the evidence that she had been involved in the May 9 transaction, the District Court calculated her Guidelines’ base offense level by aggregating the amounts of both sales. In each of these cases, the Ninth Circuit held that the sentencing courts could not consider respondents’ conduct underlying the charges of which they had been acquitted.
Held: a jury’s verdict of acquittal does not prevent a sentencing court from considering conduct underlying the acquitted charge, so long as that conduct has been proved by a preponderance of the evidence. The Ninth Circuit’s contrary holdings conflict with the clear implications of 18 U.S.C. § 3661, the Guidelines, and this Court’s double jeopardy decisions, particularly Witte v. United States, 515 U.S. 389. Section 3661 codifies the longstanding principle that sentencing courts have broad discretion to consider various kinds of information, including facts related to charges of which the defendant has been acquitted. Further, this Court has held that consideration of information about a defendant’s character and conduct at sentencing does not result in punishment for any offense other than the crime of conviction. Id. at 401. In addition, acquittal merely proves not that the defendant is innocent, but the existence of a reasonable doubt as to his guilt. Thus, an acquittal does not preclude the Government from relitigating an issue in a subsequent action governed by a lower standard of proof. Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342, 349. The acquittals below shed no light on whether a preponderance of the evidence either established Putra’s participation in the May 9 sale or Watts’ use of a firearm in connection with a drug offense.
Certiorari granted; 67 F.3d 790 and 78 F.3d 1386, reversed and remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (1997) in 519 U.S. 148 519 U.S. 149. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WZZJ6FW4GVQ7QHE.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (1997), in 519 U.S. 148, page 519 U.S. 149. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WZZJ6FW4GVQ7QHE.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (1997). cited in 1997, 519 U.S. 148, pp.519 U.S. 149. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WZZJ6FW4GVQ7QHE.
|