175.
Speech of the German Chancellor
1
A stupendous fate is breaking over Europe. For forty-four
years, since the time we fought for and won the German Empire
and our position in the world, we have lived in peace and have
protected the peace of Europe. In the works of peace we have
become strong and powerful, and have faced the fact that,
under the pretense that Germany was desirous of war, enmity
has been awakened against us in the East and the West, and
chains have been fashioned for us. The wind then sown has
brought forth the whirlwind which has now broken loose. We
wished to continue our work of peace, and, like a silent vow, the
feeling that animated every one from the kaiser down to the
youngest soldier was this: Only in defense of a just cause shall
our sword fly from its scabbard.
The day has now come when we must draw it, against our
wish, and in spite of our sincere endeavors. Russia has set
fire to the building. We are at war with Russia and France — a
war that has been forced upon us.
Gentlemen, a number of documents, composed during the
pressure of these last eventful days, are before you. Allow me
to emphasize the facts that determine our attitude.
From the first moment of the Austro-Serbian conflict we
declared that this question must be limited to Austria-Hungary
and Serbia, and we worked with this end in view. All governments,
especially that of Great Britain, took the same attitude.
Russia alone asserted that she had to be heard in the settlement
of this matter.
Thus the danger of a European crisis raised its threatening
head.
As soon as the first definite information regarding the military
preparations in Russia reached us, we declared at St. Petersburg,
in a friendly but emphatic manner, that military measures
against Austria would find us on the side of our ally, and that
military preparations against ourselves would oblige us to take
counter-measures; but that mobilization would come very near
to actual war.
Russia assured us in the most solemn manner of her desire
for peace, and declared that she was making no military preparations
against us.
In the meantime Great Britain, warmly supported by us,
tried to mediate between Vienna and St. Petersburg.
On July 28 the kaiser telegraphed to the tsar, asking him
to take into consideration the fact that it was both the duty
and the right of Austria-Hungary to defend herself against the
pan-Serb agitation which threatened to undermine her existence.
The kaiser drew the tsar’s attention to the solidarity of the
interests of all monarchs in face of the murder of Serajevo.
He asked for the latter’s personal assistance in smoothing over
the difficulties existing between Vienna and St. Petersburg.
About the same time, and before receipt of this telegram, the
tsar asked the kaiser to come to his aid and to induce Vienna
to moderate her demands. The kaiser accepted the rôle of
mediator.
But scarcely had active steps on these lines begun, when
Russia mobilized all her forces directed against Austria, while
Austria-Hungary had mobilized only those of her forces which
were directed against Serbia. To the north she had mobilized
only two army corps, far from the Russian frontier. The kaiser
immediately informed the tsar that this mobilization of Russian
forces against Austria rendered the rôle of mediator, which he
had accepted at the tsar’s request, difficult, if not impossible.
In spite of this we continued our task of mediation at Vienna
and carried it to the utmost point which was compatible with
our position as an ally.
Meanwhile Russia of her own accord renewed her assurances
that she was making no military preparations against us.
We come now to July 31. The decision was to be taken at
Vienna. Through our representations we had already obtained
the resumption of direct conversations between Vienna and
St. Petersburg, after they had been for some time interrupted.
But before the final decision was taken at Vienna, the news arrived
that Russia had mobilized her entire forces and that her
moblization was therefore directed against us also. The
Russian government, which knew from our repeated statements
what moblization on our frontiers meant, did not notify
us of this moblization, nor did it even offer any explanation.
It was not until the afternoon of July 31 that the kaiser received
a telegram from the tsar in which he guaranteed that his army
would not assume a provocative attitude toward us. But mobilization
on our frontiers had been in full swing since the night
of July 30–31.
While we were mediating at Vienna in compliance with
Russia’s request, Russian forces were appearing all along our
extended and almost entirely open frontier, and France, though
indeed not actually mobilizing, was admittedly making military
preparations. What was our position? For the sake of the
peace of Europe we had, up till then, deliberately refrained
from calling up a single reservist. Were we now to wait further
in patience until the nations on either side of us chose the moment
for their attack? It would have been a crime to expose
Germany to such peril. Therefore, on July 31 we called upon
Russia to demobilize, as the only measure which could still
preserve the peace of Europe. The imperial ambassador at
St. Petersburg was also instructed to inform the Russian government
that, in case our demand met with a refusal, we should have
to consider that a state of war existed.
The imperial ambassador has executed these instructions.
We have not yet learned what Russia answered to our demand
for demobilization. Telegraphic reports on this question
have not reached us, even though the wires still transmitted
much less important information.
Therefore, the time limit having long since expired, the
kaiser was obliged to mobilize our forces on August 1 at 5 P.M.
At the same time we had to make certain what attitude
France would assume. To our direct question, whether she
would remain neutral in the event of a Russo-German War,
France replied that she would do what her interests demanded.
That was an evasion, if not a refusal. . . .
Gentlemen, we are now in a state of necessity, and necessity
knows no law. Our troops have occupied Luxemburg and
perhaps have already entered Belgian territory.
Gentlemen, that is a breach of international law. It is
true that the French government declared at Brussels that
France would respect Belgian neutrality as long as her adversary
respected it. We knew, however, that France stood
ready for an invasion. France could wait, we could not. A
French attack on our flank on the lower Rhine might have been
disastrous. Thus we were forced to ignore the rightful protests
of the governments of Luxemburg and Belgium. The wrong — I
speak openly — the wrong we thereby commit we will try to
make good as soon as our military aims have been attained.
He who is menaced as we are and is fighting for his highest
possession can only consider how he is to hack his way through.
Gentlemen, we stand shoulder to shoulder with Austria-Hungary.
As for Great Britain’s attitude, the statements made by
Sir Edward Grey in the House of Commons yesterday show the
standpoint assumed by the British government. We have
informed the British government that, as long as Great Britain
remains neutral, our fleet will not attack the northern coast of
France, and that we will not violate the territorial integrity
and independence of Belgium. These assurances I now repeat
before the world, and I may add that, as long as Great Britain
remains neutral, we would also be willing, upon reciprocity
being assured, to take no warlike measures against French
commercial shipping.
Gentlemen, so much for the facts. I repeat the words of
the kaiser: "With a clear conscience we enter the lists." We are
fighting for the fruits of our works of peace, for the inheritance
of a great past and for our future. The fifty years are not yet
past during which Count Moltke said we should have to remain
armed to defend the inheritance that we won in 1870. Now
the great hour of trial has struck for our people. But with
clear confidence we go forward to meet it. Our army is in the
field, our navy is ready for battle — behind them stands the
entire German nation — the entire German nation united to
the last man.
1 , pp. 436–439.