Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U.S. 477 (1909)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U.S. 477 (1909)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 212 U.S. 466, click here.
Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Company No. 96 Argued January 27, 1909 Decided February 23, 1909 212 U.S. 477
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
While the judgment of the circuit court of appeals is not final under Act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat. 826, 828, where diverse citizenship exists, if the application of the Constitution of the United States is also invoked in the complaint, Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 U.S. 397, the judgment is final if the constitutional right is raised for the first time on the trial.
In a suit where the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court is based on diversity of citizenship, a recital in the petition that a judgment was rendered in another state does not amount to asserting the constitutional right that full faith and credit be given thereto so as to deprive the judgment of the circuit court of appeals of its finality.
The full faith and credit clause of the Constitution does not give any force to a judgment against a stranger, and a decision that a defendant is not estopped by a judgment by reason of notice given to him to defend does not amount, even if wrong, to a refusal to give effect to the judgment within the meaning of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.
Writ of error to review 150 F. 284 dismissed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U.S. 477 (1909) in 212 U.S. 477 212 U.S. 478. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WLPTF17IXC9LRPQ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U.S. 477 (1909), in 212 U.S. 477, page 212 U.S. 478. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WLPTF17IXC9LRPQ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U.S. 477 (1909). cited in 1909, 212 U.S. 477, pp.212 U.S. 478. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WLPTF17IXC9LRPQ.
|