Ballinger v. Frost, 216 U.S. 240 (1910)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Ballinger v. Frost, 216 U.S. 240 (1910)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 216 U.S. 234, click here.
Ballinger v. Frost No. 54 Argued December 8, 1909 Decided February 21, 1910 216 U.S. 240
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Syllabus
The power of supervision and correction vested in the Secretary of the Interior over Indian allotments is not unlimited and arbitrary; it cannot be exercised to deprive any person of land the title to which has lawfully vested.
However reluctant the courts may be to interfere with the executive department, they must prevent attempted deprivation of lawfully acquired property, and it is their duty to see that rights which have become vested pursuant to legislation of Congress are not disturbed by any action of an executive officer.
The head of a department of the government is bound by the provisions of congressional legislation, which he cannot violate, however laudable may be his motives.
After all the requirements of the Act of Congress providing for distribution of Indian lands have been complied with, and the statutory period has elapsed without contest, the title of the allottee becomes fixed and absolute, and only the ministerial duty of execution and delivery of the patent remains for the Secretary of the Interior.
The performance of a ministerial duty by an executive officer can be compelled by mandamus, and so held as to the delivery of patent to land selected by a Cherokee Indian allottee after all requirements of the Acts of Congress under which the election was made had been complied with.
30 App.D.C. 165 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ballinger v. Frost, 216 U.S. 240 (1910) in 216 U.S. 240 216 U.S. 241–216 U.S. 244. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WL8E5MSW4K2BV6C.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ballinger v. Frost, 216 U.S. 240 (1910), in 216 U.S. 240, pp. 216 U.S. 241–216 U.S. 244. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WL8E5MSW4K2BV6C.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ballinger v. Frost, 216 U.S. 240 (1910). cited in 1910, 216 U.S. 240, pp.216 U.S. 241–216 U.S. 244. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WL8E5MSW4K2BV6C.
|