|
United States v. Union Pacific R. Co., 249 U.S. 354 (1919)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Union Pacific R. Co., 249 U.S. 354 (1919)
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company No. 199 Argued January 30, 1919 Decided March 31, 1919 249 U.S. 354
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
The term "troops of the United States," as used in land grant acts, and in the agreement of the Union Pacific Company, in relation to transportation for the government, held not to embrace any of the following classes of persons, when traveling separately and not as part of a moving body or detachment of soldiers, viz: discharged soldiers, discharged military prisoners, and rejected applicants for enlistment; applicants for enlistment, provisionally accepted, but subject to final examination and not sworn in; retired enlisted men, and furloughed soldiers en route back to their stations.
52 Ct.Clms. 226 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Union Pacific R. Co., 249 U.S. 354 (1919) in 249 U.S. 354 Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WEDWLULQQVVAMIW.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Union Pacific R. Co., 249 U.S. 354 (1919), in 249 U.S. 354, Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WEDWLULQQVVAMIW.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Union Pacific R. Co., 249 U.S. 354 (1919). cited in 1919, 249 U.S. 354. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WEDWLULQQVVAMIW.
|