|
|
Price v. Forrest, 173 U.S. 410 (1899)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Price v. Forrest, 173 U.S. 410 (1899)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 173 U.S. 404, click here.
Price v. Forrest No. 105 Argued January 3-4, 1899 Decided March 6, 1899 173 U.S. 410
ERROR TO THE COURT OF .ERRORS AND
APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Syllabus
In 1850, Price, a purser in the Navy and fiscal agent. for that Department, advanced $75,000 to the government from his private fortune, to meet emergencies. His right to receive it back was questioned, and was not settled until 1891, when Congress passed an act directing the Secretary of the Treasury to adjust his account "on principles of equity and justice," and to pay to him "or to his heirs" the sum found due him on such adjustment. It was adjusted by the Secretary, and in August, 1892, it was decided that there was due to Price from the United States $76,204.08. Meanwhile, Forrest had recovered in the courts of New Jersey, of which Price was a citizen and resident, a judgment against him for $17,000. Forrest died in 1860 without having collected the amount of this judgment. In 1874, his widow, having been appointed administratrix of his estate, caused the judgment to be revived by writ of scire facias and asked for the appointment of a receiver. Price appeared and answered, and then the cause slept until August, 1892, when Mrs. Forrest filed a petition, stating that money was about to be paid to Price by the United States on his claim, and asking for the appointment of a receiver of the Treasury draft, and that Price be ordered to endorse it to the receiver, to the end that the amount might be received by him as an officer of the court and disposed of according to law. A receiver was appointed, gave bond, and entered on his duties. Price died in 1894. He left no will. No letters of administration were granted, but the New Jersey court appointed an administrator ad prosequendum. The bill in this case was then filed. The relief sought was the revival of the bill of 1874, that the administrator ad prosequendum be made a party, and that the other parties be enjoined from receiving the money from the Treasury and that the receiver be authorized to receive and dispose of it under the orders of the court. The heirs of Price set up their claims to it. The court held that the plaintiffs were entitled to the moneys in the Treasury, and its judgment was affirmed by the highest court in the state. Held that the receiver, and not the heir, was the person entitled to recover the money from the United States, and that the case did not come within the prohibitory provisions against assignments of claims against the United States contained in Rev.Stat. § 3477.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Price v. Forrest, 173 U.S. 410 (1899) in 173 U.S. 410 173 U.S. 411. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WDVUJBS9LSVLRGZ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Price v. Forrest, 173 U.S. 410 (1899), in 173 U.S. 410, page 173 U.S. 411. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WDVUJBS9LSVLRGZ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Price v. Forrest, 173 U.S. 410 (1899). cited in 1899, 173 U.S. 410, pp.173 U.S. 411. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=WDVUJBS9LSVLRGZ.
|