|
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U.S. 230 (1907)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U.S. 230 (1907)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 206 U.S. 226, click here.
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company No. 5, Original Argued February 25, 26, 1907 Decided May 13, 1907 206 U.S. 230
BILL IN EQUITY
Syllabus
When the states by their union made the forcible abatement of outside nuisances impossible to each, they did not thereby agree to submit to whatever might be done. They retained the right to make reasonable demands on the grounds of their still remaining quasi-sovereign interests, and the alternative to force a suit in this Court.
This Court has jurisdiction to, and at the suit of a state will, enjoin a corporation, citizen of another state, from discharging over its territory noxious fumes from works in another state where it appears that those fumes cause and threaten damage on a considerable scale to the forests and vegetable life, if not to health, within the plaintiff’s state.
A suit brought by a state to enjoin a corporation having its work in another state from discharging noxious gases over its territory is not the same as one between private parties, and although the elements which would form the basis of relief between private parties are wanting, the state can maintain the suit for injury in a capacity as quasi-sovereign, in which capacity it has an interest independent of and behind its citizens in all the earth and air within its domain, and whether insisting upon bringing such a suit results in more harm than good to its citizen, many of whom may profit through the maintenance of the works causing the nuisance, is for the state itself to determine.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U.S. 230 (1907) in 206 U.S. 230 206 U.S. 236. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VRWEPFQXRQ29C5Q.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U.S. 230 (1907), in 206 U.S. 230, page 206 U.S. 236. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VRWEPFQXRQ29C5Q.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U.S. 230 (1907). cited in 1907, 206 U.S. 230, pp.206 U.S. 236. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VRWEPFQXRQ29C5Q.
|