Grant v. United States, 227 U.S. 74 (1913)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Grant v. United States, 227 U.S. 74 (1913)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 227 U.S. 59, click here.
Grant v. United States No. 831 Argued January 6, 1913 Decided January 20, 1913 227 U.S. 74
APPEAL FROM AND IN ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
A judgment for criminal contempt is reviewable only by writ of error. An appeal will not lie.
Only the person charged with contempt can sue out the writ of error; one who appeared simply to state his claim to the books and papers mentioned in the subpoena does not thereby become a party to the proceeding, and he has no standing to sue out a writ of error.
Professional privilege does not relieve an attorney from producing under subpoena of the federal grand jury books and papers of a corporation left with him for safekeeping by a client who claimed to be owner thereof.
Independent books and documents of a defunct corporation left with an attorney for safekeeping by a client claiming to own them are not privileged communications.
Books an documents of a corporation must be produced by an attorney with whom they were left for safekeeping even if they might incriminate the latter.
Notwithstanding a corporation ceases to do business and transfers its books to an individual, the books retain their essential character, and are subject to inspection and examination of the proper authorities, and there is no unreasonable search and seizure in requiring their production before the grand jury in a federal proceeding. Wheeler v. United States, 226 U.S. 478.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Grant v. United States, 227 U.S. 74 (1913) in 227 U.S. 74 227 U.S. 75–227 U.S. 76. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VRC5QANMMRSVEUM.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Grant v. United States, 227 U.S. 74 (1913), in 227 U.S. 74, pp. 227 U.S. 75–227 U.S. 76. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VRC5QANMMRSVEUM.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Grant v. United States, 227 U.S. 74 (1913). cited in 1913, 227 U.S. 74, pp.227 U.S. 75–227 U.S. 76. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VRC5QANMMRSVEUM.
|