|
|
Halsell v. Renfrow, 202 U.S. 287 (1906)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Halsell v. Renfrow, 202 U.S. 287 (1906)
Halsell v. Renfrow No. 251 Submitted April 20, 1906 Decided May 14, 1906 202 U.S. 287
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA
dg:syll*
Syllabus
Where the court of first instance in a territory sees the witnesses, the full court deals with its findings as it would with the verdict of a jury, and does not go beyond questions of admissibility of evidence and whether there was any evidence to sustain the conclusion reached, and this Court goes no further unless in an unusual case.
A judgment for defendant in an action for specific performance based on a finding of fact, among others, that defendant has conveyed the property to an innocent purchaser for value cannot be reversed, as specific performance is impossible where the party to the contract has conveyed the property to one who is free from equities.
Under the Oklahoma statute in regard to conveyance of real estate, the contract, to be valid, must be in writing and subscribed by the parties thereto, and this is not met by a payment of a would-be purchaser to one claiming to he the agent of the owner but not authorized as such under the Oklahoma statute, nor in this case can such payment or a deposit of the deed in bank to be taken up under certain conditions be regarded as part performance on the part of the owner.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Halsell v. Renfrow, 202 U.S. 287 (1906) in 202 U.S. 287 202 U.S. 291. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VJ691IYFFVLU98F.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Halsell v. Renfrow, 202 U.S. 287 (1906), in 202 U.S. 287, page 202 U.S. 291. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VJ691IYFFVLU98F.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Halsell v. Renfrow, 202 U.S. 287 (1906). cited in 1906, 202 U.S. 287, pp.202 U.S. 291. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VJ691IYFFVLU98F.
|