Ingels v. Morf, 300 U.S. 290 (1937)

Name: Ingels v. Morf, 300 U.S. 290 (1937) - Syllabus
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 300 U.S. 276, click here.

Ingels v. Morf

No. 456

Argued February 5, 1937
Decided March 1, 1937
300 U.S. 290

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Syllabus

1. To justify the exaction by a State of a money payment burdening interstate commerce, it must affirmatively appear that it is demanded as reimbursement for the expense of providing facilities, or of enforcing regulations of the commerce which are within its constitutional power. This may appear from the statute itself, or from the use of the money collected, to defray such expense. P. 294.

2. The California "Caravan Act," Stats., 1935, c. 402, defines "caravaning" as the transportation

from without the State, of any motor vehicle operated on its own wheels or in tow of another vehicle for the purpose of selling or offering the same for sale . . . to any purchaser

located within or without the State; it prohibits caravaning without attaching to each vehicle a special permit, for which a fee of $15.00 is exacted. The permit is valid only for a specified trip or trips and for a period of 90 days. The Act directs that the fees collected be paid into the general fund in the state treasury, and declares that they are

intended to reimburse the state treasury for the added expense which the State may incur in the administration and enforcement of this Act, and the added expense of policing the highways over which such caravaning may be conducted, so as to provide for the safety of traffic on such highways where caravaning is being conducted.

Held:

(1) From a consideration of the Act in connection with other California enactments, it appears that the collections are used not to meet the cost of highway construction or maintenance, but to reimburse the state treasury for the added expense of administering the Caravan Act and policing the caravaning traffic. P. 295.

(2) The burden of showing that, for this purpose, the exaction is excessive rested upon the person attacking it. P. 296.

(3) Finding of the trial court that the fee is excessive was sustained by the evidence in this case. Id.

(4) The licensing provisions therefore impose an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. Morf v. Bingaman, 298 U.S. 407, distinguished. Pp. 294, 297.

14 F.Supp. 922 affirmed.

Appeal from a decree of the District Court of three judges, enjoining the enforcement of provisions of the California Caravan Act.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options

Title: Ingels v. Morf, 300 U.S. 290 (1937)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options

Title: Ingels v. Morf, 300 U.S. 290 (1937)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Ingels v. Morf, 300 U.S. 290 (1937) in 300 U.S. 290 300 U.S. 291–300 U.S. 292. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VEWTG26JRBTE3H9.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Ingels v. Morf, 300 U.S. 290 (1937), in 300 U.S. 290, pp. 300 U.S. 291–300 U.S. 292. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VEWTG26JRBTE3H9.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Ingels v. Morf, 300 U.S. 290 (1937). cited in 1937, 300 U.S. 290, pp.300 U.S. 291–300 U.S. 292. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VEWTG26JRBTE3H9.

General Summary