|
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board, 365 U.S. 667 (1961)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board, 365 U.S. 667 (1961)
Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board No. 64 Argued February 28, 1961 Decided April 17, 1961 * 365 U.S. 667
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Syllabus
An association of motor truck operators entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the Brotherhood of Teamsters and several of its local unions which, in effect, required the operators to employ casual employees "on a seniority basis" through a hiring hall operated by one of the unions, "irrespective of whether such employee is or is not a member of the Union." A union member obtained casual employment with an operator independently of the union and the hiring hall, and he was discharged when the union complained. The National Labor Relations Board held that the hiring hall arrangement was unlawful per se, and that the employer had violated §8(a)(1) and §8(a)(3) and the union had violated § 8(b)(2) and § 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. It ordered them, inter alia, to reimburse all casual employees for fees and dues paid to the union during the period covered by the complaint.
Held:
1. The Board was not authorized under §10(c) to require reimbursement of dues and fees paid to the union. Carpenters Local 60 v. Labor Board, ante, p. 651. Pp. 670-671.
2. The Board erred in holding that the hiring hall arrangement was unlawful per se, since such arrangements are not unlawful unless they in fact result in discriminations prohibited by the Act. Pp. 671-677.
107 U.S.App.D.C. 188, 275 F.2d 646, affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Teamsters Local v. Labor Board, 365 U.S. 667 (1961) in 365 U.S. 667 365 U.S. 668. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VBIZSIUQ5LVFYRC.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Teamsters Local v. Labor Board, 365 U.S. 667 (1961), in 365 U.S. 667, page 365 U.S. 668. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VBIZSIUQ5LVFYRC.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Teamsters Local v. Labor Board, 365 U.S. 667 (1961). cited in 1961, 365 U.S. 667, pp.365 U.S. 668. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=VBIZSIUQ5LVFYRC.
|