|
Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 220 U.S. 277 (1911)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 220 U.S. 277 (1911)
Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company No. 13, Original Argued February 23, 1911 Decided April 3, 1911 220 U.S. 277
BILL IN EQUITY
Syllabus
While the territorial condition lasts, the governmental power of Congress over a territory and its inhabitants is exclusive and paramount, except as restricted by the Constitution.
An act of Congress, regulating railway charges of a railway in a territory until a state government is formed and providing that thereafter such state shall have authority to regulate the charges ceases to be of force on the admission of such state into the Union, and thereafter the state can fix such charges subject only to the constitutional rights of the railway, and so held as to §§ 1-4 of the Act of July 4, 1884, c. 179, 23 Stat. 73.
A state, in its corporate capacity, has no such interest in the rights of shippers as to entitle it to maintain an original action in this Court against the carrier to restrain it from charging unreasonable rates within its jurisdiction. Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1.
The original jurisdiction conferred by the Constitution on this Court does not include every cause in which the state elects to make itself a party to vindicate the rights of its people or to enforce its own laws or public policy against wrong done generally.
The facts, which involve the construction of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States conferring original jurisdiction on this Court in controversies in which a state is a party, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 220 U.S. 277 (1911) in 220 U.S. 277 220 U.S. 282. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=V43RHDWTYWHM4E3.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 220 U.S. 277 (1911), in 220 U.S. 277, page 220 U.S. 282. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=V43RHDWTYWHM4E3.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 220 U.S. 277 (1911). cited in 1911, 220 U.S. 277, pp.220 U.S. 282. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=V43RHDWTYWHM4E3.
|