|
Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn, 373 U.S. 746 (1963)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn, 373 U.S. 746 (1963)
Retail Clerks International Association, Local 1625, AFL-CIO v. Schermerhorn No. 368 Argued April 18, 1963 Decided June 3, 1963 373 U.S. 746
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Syllabus
Petitioner union and an employer in Florida entered into a collective bargaining agreement containing an "agency shop" clause, which left union membership optional with the employees but required that, as a condition of continued employment, nonunion employees pay to the union sums equal to the initiation fees and periodic dues paid by union members. Nonunion employees of the employer sued in a Florida State Court for a declaratory judgment that this provision was "null and void" and unenforceable under the Florida "right to work" law, and for an injunction against petitioner union and the employer to prevent them from requiring nonunion employees to contribute money to the union. The Florida Supreme Court held that Florida law forbids such an "agency shop" arrangement, and that Florida courts could deal with the "agency shop" clause involved here.
Held:
1. The "agency shop" clause here involved is within the scope of § 14(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, and therefore is congressionally made subject to prohibition by Florida law, and its legality is governed by the decision of the Florida Supreme Court under review here. Pp. 747, 750-754, 757.
2. The issue as to whether Florida courts have jurisdiction to enforce the State’s prohibition against such an arrangement or whether the National Labor Relations Board has exclusive jurisdiction to afford such a remedy is left undecided, and the case is retained on the calendar for reargument on that issue. Pp. 747, 754-757.
Reported below: 141 So. 2d 269.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn, 373 U.S. 746 (1963) in 373 U.S. 746 373 U.S. 747. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UZLUS3CHNTD2S8L.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn, 373 U.S. 746 (1963), in 373 U.S. 746, page 373 U.S. 747. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UZLUS3CHNTD2S8L.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn, 373 U.S. 746 (1963). cited in 1963, 373 U.S. 746, pp.373 U.S. 747. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UZLUS3CHNTD2S8L.
|