|
Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 (1958)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 (1958)
Giordenello v. United States No. 549 Argued May 21, 1958 Decided June 30, 1958 357 U.S. 480
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
With no indictment and on his own complaint, a federal officer obtained a warrant for petitioner’s arrest, but obtained no search warrant. His complaint was not based on his personal knowledge, did not indicate the source of his belief that petitioner had committed a crime, and set forth no other sufficient basis for a finding of probable cause. With this warrant, he arrested petitioner and seized narcotics in his possession. The arrest and seizure were not challenged at petitioner’s arraignment, but a motion to suppress the use of the narcotics in evidence was made and denied before his trial. They were admitted in evidence at his trial in a federal district court, and he was convicted.
Held: The arrest and seizure were illegal, the narcotics should not have been admitted in evidence, and petitioner’s conviction must be set aside. Pp. 481-488.
1. By waiving preliminary examination before the Commissioner, petitioner did not surrender his right to contest in court the validity of the warrant on the grounds here asserted. Pp. 483-484.
2. Under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, read in the light of the Fourth Amendment, probable cause was not shown by the complaint, and the warrant for arrest was issued illegally. Pp. 484-487.
3. Having relied entirely in the courts below on the validity of the warrant, the Government cannot contend in this Court that the arrest was justified apart from the warrant, because the arresting officer had probable cause to believe that petitioner had committed a felony; nor should the case be sent back to the District Court for a special hearing on the issue of probable cause. Pp. 487-488.
241 F.2d 575 reversed.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 (1958) in 357 U.S. 480 357 U.S. 481. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UV4G436WS1ZRXVT.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 (1958), in 357 U.S. 480, page 357 U.S. 481. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UV4G436WS1ZRXVT.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 (1958). cited in 1958, 357 U.S. 480, pp.357 U.S. 481. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UV4G436WS1ZRXVT.
|