Wright v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 236 U.S. 687 (1915)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Wright v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 236 U.S. 687 (1915)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 236 U.S. 674, click here.
Wright v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company No. 162 Argued January 29, 1915 Decided March 22, 1915 236 U.S. 687
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APAPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Wright v. Central Ry. of Georgia, ante, p. 674, followed to effect that, under the statutes of Georgia and the leases involved in this action, executions for ad valorem taxes on railroads the owners whereof were exempted by statute from a greater tax than a specified percent on the income, could not be enforced against those in possession of the railroads as lessees.
The fact that owners of a railroad, who are exempted by statute from paying a greater tax than a specified percent on the income thereof, lease the entire road to another company does not open the right of the state to tax such lessees on the fee of the property.
In this case, the exemption of the lessor from taxation on its road which it has leased applies to betterments and improvements made by the lessee such as the lessor would have made to meet enlarging business and so also as to rolling stock substituted for that of the lessor and which under the lease belongs to the lessor.
Railroad property jointly used with exempted property but not part of the road originally exempted may be subject to assessment, but not in one assessment covering both the classes of property.
201 F. 1023 modified and affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Wright v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 236 U.S. 687 (1915) in 236 U.S. 687 236 U.S. 688. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UU3Y7F76Y99LZ8T.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Wright v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 236 U.S. 687 (1915), in 236 U.S. 687, page 236 U.S. 688. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UU3Y7F76Y99LZ8T.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Wright v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 236 U.S. 687 (1915). cited in 1915, 236 U.S. 687, pp.236 U.S. 688. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UU3Y7F76Y99LZ8T.
|