Herrick v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co., 200 U.S. 96 (1906)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Herrick v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co., 200 U.S. 96 (1906)
Herrick v. Boquillas Land and Cattle Company No. 105 Submitted December 7, 1905 Decided January 2, 1906 200 U.S. 96
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA
Syllabus
On appeal from the supreme court of a territory, the jurisdiction of this Court, apart from reviewing exceptions to rulings on evidence, is limited to determining whether the findings support the judgment.
A finding of a territorial court that one of the parties held title to an undivided interest in the land in controversy acquired by conveyance duly made from his grantors to whom the Mexican government had conveyed it in 1833, by good and sufficient grant, which had in 1900 been recognized and confirmed by the United States government, is one of fact, and sufficient to sustain the conclusion of law that the title to the land is in that party.
A judgment of the Court of Private Land Claims is not only tantamount to a quitclaim from the United States, subject to the rights of third parties, but it is also conclusive as to existence of a record title upon those claiming to hold under rights originating subsequently to the cession of the territory from Mexico and also upon those claiming title by adverse possession.
There was no statute of limitations in Arizona prior to 1901 barring a right of action for the recovery of lands by one claiming title against another holding merely by peaceable and adverse possession, and paragraph 2938, Rev.Stat., Arizona, 1901, requiring such an action to be instituted within ten years after the cause of action accrues has no retroactive effect making it applicable to an action commenced prior to its enactment and under the circumstances of this case.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Herrick v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co., 200 U.S. 96 (1906) in 200 U.S. 96 Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=US8NEMY9G6FRDJN.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Herrick v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co., 200 U.S. 96 (1906), in 200 U.S. 96, Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=US8NEMY9G6FRDJN.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Herrick v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co., 200 U.S. 96 (1906). cited in 1906, 200 U.S. 96. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=US8NEMY9G6FRDJN.
|