|
Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 280 (1952)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 280 (1952)
Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc. No. 38 Argued November 10, 1952 Decided December 22, 1952 344 U.S. 280
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Under the Lanham Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., a federal district court has jurisdiction to award relief to an American corporation against acts of trademark infringement and unfair competition consummated in a foreign country by a citizen and resident of the United States who purchases parts here and some of whose products, sold abroad, enter this country where they may reflect adversely on the American corporation’s trade reputation. Pp. 281-289.
(a) It is not material that the infringing trademark was affixed in a foreign country, or that the purchase of parts in this country, when viewed in isolation, did not violate any law of the United States. P. 287.
(b) American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 213 U.S. 347, distinguished. Pp. 288-289.
(c) Where there can be no interference with the sovereignty of another nation, the district court, in exercising its equity powers, may command persons properly before it to cease or perform acts outside its territorial jurisdiction. P. 289.
194 F.2d 567 affirmed.
A Federal District Court dismissed a suit for injunctive and monetary relief brought by an American corporation against a citizen and resident of the United States for acts of trademark infringement and unfair competition consummated in Mexico. The Court of Appeals reversed. 194 F.2d 567. This Court granted certiorari. 343 U.S. 962. Affirmed, p. 289.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 280 (1952) in 344 U.S. 280 344 U.S. 281. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UM22PYWB6LH41QA.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 280 (1952), in 344 U.S. 280, page 344 U.S. 281. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UM22PYWB6LH41QA.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 280 (1952). cited in 1952, 344 U.S. 280, pp.344 U.S. 281. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=UM22PYWB6LH41QA.
|