Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 (1937)

Name: Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 (1937) - Syllabus
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 300 U.S. 216, click here.

Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth

No. 446

Argued February 4, 1937
Decided March 1, 1937
300 U.S. 227

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

1. The Federal Declaratory Judgment Act deals with "controversies" in the constitutional sense, and is procedural only. P. 239.

2. In the exercise of its control over practice and procedure of the lower federal courts, Congress is not limited to traditional forms or remedies, but may create and improve, as well as abolish or restrict. P. 240.

3. A controversy, in the constitutional sense and in the sense of the Declaratory Judgment Act, must be justiciable -- it must be definite and concrete, touching the legal relation of parties having adverse legal interests -- it must be a real and substantial controversy admitting of specific relief through a conclusive decree, as distinguished from an opinion advising what the law would be upon a hypothetical statement of facts. P. 240.

4. There may be adjudication of the rights of parties without award of process or payment of damages and where no allegation of irreparable injury is made. P. 241.

5. Where the holder of life insurance policies claims, under disability benefit clauses, that, notwithstanding nonpayment of premiums, the policies, by reason of his total and permanent disability, remain in force and entitle him to cash benefits, and makes repeated and persistent demands upon the insurer accordingly, whereas the insurer denies that such disability existed and insists that the policies have lapsed because the premiums were not paid, there is an "actual controversy" on which suit may be maintained by the insurer against the insured under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act. P. 242.

8 F.2d 695, reversed.

CERTIORARI, 299 U.S. 536.

This suit by the Insurance Company, under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, was dismissed by the District Court upon the ground that there was no justiciable controversy. 11 F.Supp. 1016. The decree was affirmed by the court below.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options

Title: Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 (1937)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options

Title: Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 (1937)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 (1937) in 300 U.S. 227 300 U.S. 228–300 U.S. 236. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=U7KIJGKYA2R5NEH.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 (1937), in 300 U.S. 227, pp. 300 U.S. 228–300 U.S. 236. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=U7KIJGKYA2R5NEH.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 (1937). cited in 1937, 300 U.S. 227, pp.300 U.S. 228–300 U.S. 236. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=U7KIJGKYA2R5NEH.

General Summary