|
|
Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 203 U.S. 64 (1906)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 203 U.S. 64 (1906)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 203 U.S. 56, click here.
Fidelity Mut. Life Insurance Company v. Clark No. 25 Argued October 15, 16, 1906 Decided October 29, 1906 203 U.S. 64
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Syllabus
A man and his sister conspired to defraud an insurance company; the former having insured his life disappeared and the latter as beneficiary filed proof of death, brought suit, and recovered judgment after verdict by a jury; the company defended on ground that insured was alive and claim was fraudulent. The judgment was affirmed, and the company paid the money into court. In order to have the suit prosecuted, the beneficiary had made contingent fee contracts with attorneys which had been filed, and the money was distributed from the registry of the court to her and the various parties holding assignments of interests therein. The insurance company, having afterwards found the insured was alive, sued in equity the beneficiary and also her counsel and their assignees to recover the money received by them respectively. No charge of fraud was made against anyone except the beneficiary, but notice of the fraud was charged against all by virtue of the company’s defense. The defendants claimed that, under the Seventh Amendment, the question of death of person insured could not again be litigated. The bill was dismissed as to all except the beneficiary.
Held, as to the defendants other than the beneficiary, that, as the action was prosecuted in good faith, whatever notice they may have had by virtue of the company’s defense was purged by the verdict, and although they had received their respective shares from the proceeds paid into court, it was the same in law as though they had been paid in money directly by the judgment creditor, and it could not be recovered.
Whether, in view of the Seventh Amendment, a federal court sitting in equity may inquire into whether a judgment based on a verdict was obtained by fraud, and, if so found, set the verdict aside, argued, but not decided.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 203 U.S. 64 (1906) in 203 U.S. 64 203 U.S. 65–203 U.S. 72. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TYC9CKNJ7XB6PJJ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 203 U.S. 64 (1906), in 203 U.S. 64, pp. 203 U.S. 65–203 U.S. 72. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TYC9CKNJ7XB6PJJ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 203 U.S. 64 (1906). cited in 1906, 203 U.S. 64, pp.203 U.S. 65–203 U.S. 72. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TYC9CKNJ7XB6PJJ.
|