Jones v. Perkins, 245 U.S. 390 (1918)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 245 U.S. 366, click here.

Jones v. Perkins


No. 738


Argued December 13, 14, 1917
Decided January 7, 1918
245 U.S. 390

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Syllabus

Petitioner sought habeas corpus upon the ground that the Selective Draft Law, for disobedience of which he was arrested, was unconstitutional. The constitutional questions he raises having all been decided adversely to him in the Selective Draft Law cases, ante,366, the Court affirms the trial court’s order refusing the writ, without, however, departing from the general principle that habeas corpus should not anticipate trial in criminal cases in the absence of exceptional circumstances, and without inquiring whether, in this case, such circumstances existed.

23 F. 997 affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.