|
Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. McGrew Coal Co., 244 U.S. 191 (1917)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. McGrew Coal Co., 244 U.S. 191 (1917)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 244 U.S. 184, click here.
Missouri Pacific Railway Company v. McGrew Coal Company * No. 222 Argued April 26, 1917 Decided May 21, 1917 244 U.S. 191
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
The court is not called upon to consider state statutes passed for the enforcement of a provision in the state constitution, when the latter, as construed and applied in the case by the state supreme court is self-executing and covers the judgment in question.
As applied to a company engaged in both interstate and intrastate traffic, a state regulation, in respect of the latter only, which forbids any railroad company in general terms from charging more for a shorter haul than for a longer haul for the same class of freight over any portion of it line within the state without regard to direction, circumstances, or condition, and which allows the shipper an absolute right to recover any overcharge collected from him in violation of the prohibition, is consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the Interstate Commerce Act, in the absence of special facts and circumstances warranting a different conclusion in the particular ease. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Kentucky, 183 U.S. 503.
To claim exemption from such regulations under the Contract Clause, the existence of a special protecting contract must be shown by the record.
178 S.W. 1179 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. McGrew Coal Co., 244 U.S. 191 (1917) in 244 U.S. 191 244 U.S. 192. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TPCINP1WVGJSYP4.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. McGrew Coal Co., 244 U.S. 191 (1917), in 244 U.S. 191, page 244 U.S. 192. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TPCINP1WVGJSYP4.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. McGrew Coal Co., 244 U.S. 191 (1917). cited in 1917, 244 U.S. 191, pp.244 U.S. 192. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TPCINP1WVGJSYP4.
|