United States v. Ptasynski, 462 U.S. 74 (1983)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Ptasynski, 462 U.S. 74 (1983)
United States v. Ptasynski No. 82-1066 Argued April 27, 1983 Decided June 6, 1983 462 U.S. 74
APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT OF WYOMING
Syllabus
The Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax Act of 1980 exempts from the tax imposed by the Act domestic crude oil defined as oil produced from wells located north of the Arctic Circle or on the northerly side of the divide of the Alaska-Aleutian Range and at least 75 miles from the nearest point on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline system.
Held. This exemption does not violate the Uniformity Clause’s requirement that taxes be "uniform throughout the United States." Pp. 80-86.
(a) The Uniformity Clause does not require Congress to devise a tax that falls equally or proportionately on each State, nor does the Clause prevent Congress from defining the subject of a tax by drawing distinctions between similar classes. Pp. 80-82.
(b) Identifying "exempt Alaskan oil" in terms of its geographic boundaries does not render the exemption invalid. Neither the language of the Uniformity Clause nor this Court’s decisions prohibit all geographically defined classifications. That Clause gives Congress wide latitude in deciding what to tax, and does not prohibit it from considering geographically isolated problems. Here, Congress cannot be faulted for determining, based on neutral factors, that "exempt Alaskan oil" required separate favorable treatment. Such determination reflects Congress’ considered judgment that unique climatic and geographic conditions required that oil produced from the defined region be exempted from the windfall profit tax, which was devised to tax "windfalls" that some oil producers would receive as the result of the deregulation of domestic oil prices that was part of the Government’s program to encourage the exploration for and production of oil. Pp. 84-86.
550 F.Supp. 549, reversed.
POWELL, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Ptasynski, 462 U.S. 74 (1983) in 462 U.S. 74 462 U.S. 75. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TNXG68MAVCWSTJU.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Ptasynski, 462 U.S. 74 (1983), in 462 U.S. 74, page 462 U.S. 75. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TNXG68MAVCWSTJU.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Ptasynski, 462 U.S. 74 (1983). cited in 1983, 462 U.S. 74, pp.462 U.S. 75. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=TNXG68MAVCWSTJU.
|