|
|
Douglas v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 279 U.S. 377 (1929)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Douglas v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 279 U.S. 377 (1929)
Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company No. 312 Argued January 16, 1929 Reargued April 15, 16, 1929 Decided May 13, 1929 279 U.S. 377
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK,
NINTH DISTRICT
Syllabus
1. In determining whether the privileges and immunities clause of the Constitution, or an Act of Congress, is contravened by a state statute, the purport established for the state statute by the highest court of the state is accepted here. P. 385.
2. Where a state law is susceptible of two constructions, one of which might put it in conflict with the Federal Constitution, it is to be presumed that the other construction, rendering it valid, would be adopted by the state courts. P. 386.
3. In § 1780 of the New York Code of Civil Procedure, under which, as locally construed, actions by nonresidents against foreign corporations doing business in the state are subject to dismissal at the discretion of the court, the term "nonresident" should be interpreted as embracing citizens of the state who do not actually live in the state at the time of bringing such actions. P. 386.
4. A state law under which citizens of the state who actually reside there have the right to maintain actions in the state courts against foreign corporations doing business there on causes of action arising from foreign torts, but under which such actions, when brought by nonresidents, whether citizens of that state or of other states, are subject to dismissal at the discretion of the court, makes a distinction based on rational considerations, and does not violate the privileges and immunities clause, Art. IV, § 2, of the Constitution. P. 387.
5. The Federal Employers’ Liability Act does not purport to require state courts to entertain actions under it as against an otherwise valid excuse under the state law. P. 387.
248 N.Y. 580 affirmed.
Certiorari, 278 U.S. 590, to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of New York, entered on a rescript from the Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of an action brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. See also 223 App.Div. (N.Y.) 782. The Attorney General of New York was given leave to file a brief and take part in the reargument because of the importance of the case.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Douglas v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 279 U.S. 377 (1929) in 279 U.S. 377 279 U.S. 378–279 U.S. 385. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=STXLIQN6RV5P4KQ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Douglas v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 279 U.S. 377 (1929), in 279 U.S. 377, pp. 279 U.S. 378–279 U.S. 385. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=STXLIQN6RV5P4KQ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Douglas v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co., 279 U.S. 377 (1929). cited in 1929, 279 U.S. 377, pp.279 U.S. 378–279 U.S. 385. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=STXLIQN6RV5P4KQ.
|