National Council v. State Council, 203 U.S. 151 (1906)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
National Council v. State Council, 203 U.S. 151 (1906)
National Council of Junior Order of United American Mechanics of United States v. State Council of Virginia, Junior Order of United American Mechanics of State of Virginia No. 8 Argued November 7, 8, 1906 Decided November 1, 1906 203 U.S. 151
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA
Syllabus
A benefit association incorporated under a state law and styling itself a National Council granted charters to various voluntary organizations in other states, styled State Councils, for similar purposes under conditions expressed in the charters. A dominant portion of the members of a State Council procured a charter from the state legislature granting the corporation so formed under the same name powers in some respects exclusive in that state to carry on a similar work, but saving any rights of property possessed by the National Council. In a suit, brought by the latter, held that:
Whatever relations may have existed between the National Council and the voluntary State Council, there was no contract between the former and the incorporated State Council which was impaired, and the act of incorporation was not void within the impairment clause of the federal Constitution.
A state has the right to exclude a foreign corporation and forbid it from constituting branches within its boundaries, and this power extends to a corporation already within its jurisdiction. A single foreign corporation may be expelled from a state by a special act if the act does not deprive it of property without due process of law.
The property of which a corporation cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment does not include the mere right of a foreign corporation to extend its business and membership in a state which otherwise may exclude it from its boundaries.
104 Va. 197 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," National Council v. State Council, 203 U.S. 151 (1906) in 203 U.S. 151 203 U.S. 158. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SRNTZENIJKFXILQ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." National Council v. State Council, 203 U.S. 151 (1906), in 203 U.S. 151, page 203 U.S. 158. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SRNTZENIJKFXILQ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in National Council v. State Council, 203 U.S. 151 (1906). cited in 1906, 203 U.S. 151, pp.203 U.S. 158. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SRNTZENIJKFXILQ.
|