|
Perez Y Fernandez v. Fernandez Y Perez, 220 U.S. 224 (1911)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Perez Y Fernandez v. Fernandez Y Perez, 220 U.S. 224 (1911)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 220 U.S. 214, click here.
Perez y Fernandez v. Fernandez y Perez No. 110 Argued March 17, 1911 Decided April 3, 1911 220 U.S. 224
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO
Syllabus
Where the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico has general jurisdiction under the Act of March 2, 1901, c. 812, § 3, 31 Stat; 953, its power to award relief because of the situation of the property involved against nonresident defendants not found within the district depends on § 8 of the Act of March 3, 1875, c. 137, 18 Stat. 472, and the right of absent parties defendants not actually personally notified to have the suit reopened and to make defense depends on the proviso to that section.
Where a defendant has not been actually personally notified as provided in § 8 of the Act of 1875, but publication has been resorted to, he has a right to appear and make defense within a year, independently of whether he has had knowledge or notice of the pendency of the action by any methods other than those specified in the statute, and the court has no power to impose terms except as to costs.
The District Court of the United States for Porto Rico having permitted certain defendants not personally notified to come in and defend to do so, but only on condition of showing they had not received the published notice, had no knowledge of the pendency of the suit and had no meritorious defense to the bill, the order is reversed, as the defendants have the right to have the case reopened without terms other than payment of costs.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Perez Y Fernandez v. Fernandez Y Perez, 220 U.S. 224 (1911) in 220 U.S. 224 220 U.S. 225. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SQZDLUMW3QBRS1F.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Perez Y Fernandez v. Fernandez Y Perez, 220 U.S. 224 (1911), in 220 U.S. 224, page 220 U.S. 225. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SQZDLUMW3QBRS1F.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Perez Y Fernandez v. Fernandez Y Perez, 220 U.S. 224 (1911). cited in 1911, 220 U.S. 224, pp.220 U.S. 225. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SQZDLUMW3QBRS1F.
|