Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia Ins. Co., 279 U.S. 405 (1929)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia Ins. Co., 279 U.S. 405 (1929)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 279 U.S. 401, click here.
Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia Insurance Company No. 450 Argued March 7, 1929 Decided May 13, 1929 279 U.S. 405
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. A foreign corporation held not suable without its consent in a state wherein it had done no business. P. 408.
2. In making compacts of reinsurance in one state with insurers of property situate in another state, a foreign insurance company is not doing business in the second state. Id.
3. A Danish insurance company, whose business in this country was confined to reinsurance contracts made in New York, in order to comply with the law of Mississippi (Hemingway’s Code, 1927, § 5864) where property covered by some of the insured risks was situate, appointed the Mississippi insurance commissioner its attorney upon whom process might be served, the authorization stating that service upon him should be deemed valid personal service upon the company and that such authority should continue so long as any liability of the company remained outstanding in Mississippi, whether incurred before or after such appointment. Held that the statute and the appointment should not be construed as empowering the Mississippi courts to entertain an action brought against the company by a Louisiana corporation on a contract of marine insurance entered into abroad and unrelated to any matter in Mississippi. P. 408.
4. A defendant does not waive objection to jurisdiction over his person by removing the case from the state to the federal court; nor by joining his plea to the jurisdiction with a plea in abatement because of another action pending, as permitted by the local practice and the Conformity Act. P. 409.
27 F.2d 329 affirmed.
Certiorari, 278 U.S. 592, to review a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which affirmed a judgment of the district court dismissing the action for want of jurisdiction.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia Ins. Co., 279 U.S. 405 (1929) in 279 U.S. 405 279 U.S. 406. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SJ8UT68WSM36V17.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia Ins. Co., 279 U.S. 405 (1929), in 279 U.S. 405, page 279 U.S. 406. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SJ8UT68WSM36V17.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia Ins. Co., 279 U.S. 405 (1929). cited in 1929, 279 U.S. 405, pp.279 U.S. 406. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SJ8UT68WSM36V17.
|