|
United States v. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee R. Co., 288 U.S. 1 (1933)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee R. Co., 288 U.S. 1 (1933)
United States v. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railroad Co., No. 264 Argued December 16, 1932 Decided January 9, 1933 288 U.S. 1
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Syllabus
1. An independent electric railroad, built and equipped primarily for interurban and suburban passenger service, and whose traffic is mainly of that character, but which interchanges passengers and freight with steam railroads and competes with them, the freight business being, however, subsidiary in amount and function and not fairly comparable to the ordinary freight business of a standard steam railroad, held an "interurban electric railway" within the meaning of § 20a of the Interstate Commerce Act, and therefore excepted, by par. 1 of that section, from the necessity of obtaining authority from the Commission before issuing bonds. P. 10.
2. In so holding, the Court assumes the question to be doubtful, but decides that the status of the carrier as an "interurban electric railway" is settled by the uniform construction of § 20a applied to it by the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Commission having for many years resolved doubt in favor of the carrier and the carrier having issued large amounts of bonds in reliance upon this administrative construction, and without any objection from the Commission. P. 13.
Affirmed.
Appeal from a decree dismissing a bill filed by the United States praying that the railroad company be enjoined from issuing securities or assuming obligations without authority from the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee R. Co., 288 U.S. 1 (1933) in 288 U.S. 1 288 U.S. 6. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SBQEJM277QMWF91.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee R. Co., 288 U.S. 1 (1933), in 288 U.S. 1, page 288 U.S. 6. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SBQEJM277QMWF91.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee R. Co., 288 U.S. 1 (1933). cited in 1933, 288 U.S. 1, pp.288 U.S. 6. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SBQEJM277QMWF91.
|