|
|
Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957)
Pollard v. United States No. 38 Argued December 3, 1956 Decided February 25, 1957 352 U.S. 354
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
After petitioner had pleaded guilty to a federal offense and had left the courtroom, the District Court entered judgment suspending sentence and placed petitioner on probation for three years. Nearly two years later, in 1954, upon petitioner’s arrest for violation of probation, the District Court entered a formal judgment and commitment sentencing petitioner to 2 years’ imprisonment and setting aside the earlier judgment and order. Petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate this sentence was denied by the District Court; the Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal, and this Court granted certiorari.
Held:
1. Although petitioner was released from federal prison after this Court granted his petition for certiorari, the possibility of consequences collateral to the imposition of sentence is sufficiently substantial to justify decision of this case on the merits. P. 358.
2. The Court deems it proper to consider questions as to the legality of the 1954 sentence, raised by petitioner in his brief, although, had petitioner been represented by counsel in the courts below and upon his petition for certiorari, those questions might well have been deemed neither preserved below nor raised in the petition. P. 359.
3. The 1954 sentence did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Pp. 359-361.
4. The 1954 sentence did not violate petitioner’s right under the Sixth Amendment to a speedy trial, nor the provision of Rule 32(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requiring imposition of sentence "without unreasonable delay." Pp. 361-362.
5. Petitioner’s other contentions, that in sentencing him in 1954, the trial judge disregarded the standards prescribed for such a proceeding, are not properly before the Court and are unsupported by the record. Pp. 362-363.
6. Since the decision of this case on the merits is against the petitioner, the question whether the Court of Appeals properly denied leave to appeal need not be determined. P. 363.
Affirmed.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957) in 352 U.S. 354 352 U.S. 355. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SA1FSDLVL8VF6HH.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957), in 352 U.S. 354, page 352 U.S. 355. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SA1FSDLVL8VF6HH.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957). cited in 1957, 352 U.S. 354, pp.352 U.S. 355. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=SA1FSDLVL8VF6HH.
|