|
|
Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co., 248 U.S. 205 (1918)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co., 248 U.S. 205 (1918)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 248 U.S. 185, click here.
Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Company No. 393, 394 Argued November 5, 1918 Decided December 23, 1918 248 U.S. 205
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Section 11 of the Seaman’s Act of 1915, c. 153, 38 Stat. 1164, construed as not prohibiting advance payment of wages when made by an American vessel to secure seamen in a foreign port. P. 212. Sandlerg v. McDonald, ante,185.
250 F. 180 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co., 248 U.S. 205 (1918) in 248 U.S. 205 248 U.S. 206–248 U.S. 207. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RQ4W5445S68QPZU.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co., 248 U.S. 205 (1918), in 248 U.S. 205, pp. 248 U.S. 206–248 U.S. 207. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RQ4W5445S68QPZU.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co., 248 U.S. 205 (1918). cited in 1918, 248 U.S. 205, pp.248 U.S. 206–248 U.S. 207. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RQ4W5445S68QPZU.
|