|
Tilton v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 376 U.S. 169 (1964)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Tilton v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 376 U.S. 169 (1964)
Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. No. 49 Argued January 7, 1964 Decided February 17, 1964 376 U.S. 169
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Petitioners were employees of respondent railroad who had been provisionally "upgraded" (advanced) from helpers to journeymen in accordance with an agreement between their union and the railroad, under which permanent seniority status as journeymen could be achieved following completion of a prescribed work period in the upgraded position. Petitioners’ completion of the work period was delayed by their absence in military service, resulting in previously junior nonveterans completing the work period before petitioners, and thereby attaining status senior to that of petitioners. Seeking restoration of seniority rights under Section 9 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, petitioners brought this action in the District Court, which denied relief, and the Court of Appeals affirmed on the ground that petitioners’ promotions were subject to contingencies and "variables" which precluded their advancement in status under the Act.
Held:
1. Under § 9(c)(1) and the "escalator principle" embodied in § 9(c)(2) of the Act, petitioners, upon completion of the work period, were entitled to seniority as of the earlier date on which they would have completed the work period but for their absence in military service. Diehl v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 348 U.S. 960, followed. Pp. 175-177.
2. Petitioners’ advancement, unlike that involved in McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 357 U.S. 265, did not depend upon the exercise of management discretion, but was reasonably automatic and foreseeable. Pp. 180-181.
306 F.2d 870 reversed and remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Tilton v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 376 U.S. 169 (1964) in 376 U.S. 169 376 U.S. 170. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RNZMTRBE6NGIZMX.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Tilton v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 376 U.S. 169 (1964), in 376 U.S. 169, page 376 U.S. 170. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RNZMTRBE6NGIZMX.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Tilton v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 376 U.S. 169 (1964). cited in 1964, 376 U.S. 169, pp.376 U.S. 170. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RNZMTRBE6NGIZMX.
|