Detroit United Railway v. Detroit, 229 U.S. 39 (1913)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Detroit United Railway v. Detroit, 229 U.S. 39 (1913)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 229 U.S. 31, click here.
Detroit United Railway v. Detroit No. 1047 Submitted May 5, 1913 Decided May 26, 1913 229 U.S. 39
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Syllabus
Franchises granting rights of the public must be in plain language, certain and definite in terms and containing no ambiguities. They are to be strictly construed against the grantee. Cleveland Electric Ry. Co. v. Cleveland, 204 U.S. 116.
An ordinance requiring a street railway company to comply with certain conditions on all of it lines until the expiration of the franchise of longest duration held not to constitute a contract, extending all the franchises to the date of such expiration, within the protection of the contract clause of the federal Constitution.
Where a street railroad company is operating in the streets of a city for a definite period and has enjoyed the full term granted, the municipality may, upon failure of renewal of the grant, require the company within a reasonable time to remove it tracks and other property from the streets, without impairing any contractual obligation protected by the federal Constitution or depriving the company of its property without due process of law.
156 Mich. 106 affirmed.
The facts, which involve the validity of a decree of the state court holding that certain franchises of the railway company had expired and that it should pay the city temporary rental for the use of certain streets or vacate those streets, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Detroit United Railway v. Detroit, 229 U.S. 39 (1913) in 229 U.S. 39 229 U.S. 40. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RHGGDRCT93CWAXZ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Detroit United Railway v. Detroit, 229 U.S. 39 (1913), in 229 U.S. 39, page 229 U.S. 40. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RHGGDRCT93CWAXZ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Detroit United Railway v. Detroit, 229 U.S. 39 (1913). cited in 1913, 229 U.S. 39, pp.229 U.S. 40. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RHGGDRCT93CWAXZ.
|