|
|
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Brown, 229 U.S. 317 (1913)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Brown, 229 U.S. 317 (1913)
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company v. Brown No. 230 Argued April 18, 1913 Decided June 10, 1913 229 U.S. 317
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Where the case is within the class which it was the purpose of the Judiciary Act of 1891 to submit to the final jurisdiction of the circuit court of appeals, this Court goes no further than to inquire whether plain error is made out. Texas & Pacific Railway v. Howell, 224 U.S. 577.
Under the Safety Appliance Acts, the failure of a coupler to work at any time sustains a charge of negligence on the part of the carrier. C., B. & Q. R. Co. v. United States, 220 U.S. 559.
Where the trial court and the circuit court of appeals have, after considering the evidence, confirmed the verdict, this Court will hesitate to say that their concurring judgments are not such as could be reasonably formed or are without foundation as matter of law.
One obliged to form a judgment in an emergency on the spot is not to be held accountable in the same measure as one able to judge the situation in cold abstraction. The Germanic, 196 U.S. 589.
The movement of trains requires prompt action, and one engaged therein should not be held guilty of contributory negligence because he did not anticipate that he might be injured if he selected one of several ways of performing his duty even though he had knowledge of the existence of that which caused his injury.
185 F. 80 affirmed.
The facts, which involve the construction of the Safety Appliance Acts and determination of what constitutes contributory negligence on the part of a switchman in a railway yard, are stated in opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Brown, 229 U.S. 317 (1913) in 229 U.S. 317 229 U.S. 318. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RG8YVQJM2FDVSSC.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Brown, 229 U.S. 317 (1913), in 229 U.S. 317, page 229 U.S. 318. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RG8YVQJM2FDVSSC.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Brown, 229 U.S. 317 (1913). cited in 1913, 229 U.S. 317, pp.229 U.S. 318. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=RG8YVQJM2FDVSSC.
|