|
|
Kaisha v. U.S. Phillips Corp., 510 U.S. 27 (1993)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Kaisha v. U.S. Phillips Corp., 510 U.S. 27 (1993)
Kaisa v. U.S. Phillips Corp. No. 92-1123 Decided November 30, 1993 510 U.S. 27
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Petitioner Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha was a party at the flrst trial in an action brought against it and respondent Windmere Corporation by respondent U.S. Philips Corporation, but was not a party to the second trial, in which Windmere prevailed. While the judgments from the second trial were on appeal, respondents reached a settlement and flled a joint motion to vacate the District Court’s judgments. Izumi’s motion to intervene in the appeal for purposes of opposing vacatur was denied by the Court of Appeals on the ground that Izumi was not a party to the action, and the court went on to find that vacatur was appropriate.
Held: the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. The single question Izumi presented to this Court for review is whether the courts of appeals should routinely vacate district court flnal judgments at the parties’ request when cases are settled on appeal. However, in order to reach this question, the Court would have to address a question not raised by Izumi until its brief on the merits: whether the Court of Appeals improperly denied Izumi’s motion to intervene. Since the latter question was neither presented in the petition for certiorari nor fairly included in the question that was presented, as required by this Court’s Rule 14.1, it can be considered only if the Court deems this to be an exceptional case. The case bears scant resemblance to those cases in which the Court has made exceptions to the Rule’s provisions, for it is unlikely that any new principle of law would be enunciated should review be undertaken. Moreover, faithful application of the Rule helps ensure that the Court is not tempted to engage in ill-considered decisions of relatively fact-bound issues not presented in the petition in order to reach the question on which certiorari was actually granted. It also informs those seeking review that the Court strongly disapproves the practice of smuggling additional questions into a case after certiorari is granted.
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 971 F.2d 728.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Kaisha v. U.S. Phillips Corp., 510 U.S. 27 (1993) in 510 U.S. 27 510 U.S. 28. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QZY2F9ZX8GGYXXU.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Kaisha v. U.S. Phillips Corp., 510 U.S. 27 (1993), in 510 U.S. 27, page 510 U.S. 28. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QZY2F9ZX8GGYXXU.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Kaisha v. U.S. Phillips Corp., 510 U.S. 27 (1993). cited in 1993, 510 U.S. 27, pp.510 U.S. 28. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QZY2F9ZX8GGYXXU.
|