Thomas v. Matthiessen, 232 U.S. 221 (1914)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Thomas v. Matthiessen, 232 U.S. 221 (1914)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 232 U.S. 199, click here.
Thomas v. Matthiessen No. 171 Argued January 19, 1914 Decided February 2, 1914 232 U.S. 221
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Syllabus
While a corporation cannot, without authority from the stockholders, make them answerable in a way not contemplated by the charter, a provision in the charter of a corporation organized in one state authorizing it to do business in another state may subject the stockholders to the liability imposed in the latter state, notwithstanding there are other provisions in the charter exempting stockholders from liability for debts of the corporation.
Stockholders of a corporation organized in one state under a charter expressly authorizing it to do business in another state create the corporation their agent for the making of contracts within the latter state in accordance with its laws.
Stockholders of a corporation organized in Arizona under a charter which expressly authorized the corporation to do business in California held, in this case, subject to the liability imposed by § 322, Civil Code of the latter state.
Under the laws of California, a stockholder is liable for his proportion of the debts of the corporation as a principal, and not as a surety; nor in this case was he relieved of liability on notes held by a bank which had deposits to the credit of the corporation and did not apply the same to payment of the notes.
192 F. 495 reversed.
The facts, which involve the liability under the laws of California of a stockholder of a corporation organized in Arizona for the purpose of carrying on business in California, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Thomas v. Matthiessen, 232 U.S. 221 (1914) in 232 U.S. 221 232 U.S. 222–232 U.S. 232. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QE2121ADK7CGQ6C.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Thomas v. Matthiessen, 232 U.S. 221 (1914), in 232 U.S. 221, pp. 232 U.S. 222–232 U.S. 232. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QE2121ADK7CGQ6C.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Thomas v. Matthiessen, 232 U.S. 221 (1914). cited in 1914, 232 U.S. 221, pp.232 U.S. 222–232 U.S. 232. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QE2121ADK7CGQ6C.
|