Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 285 U.S. 119 (1932)

Name: Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 285 U.S. 119 (1932) - Syllabus
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 285 U.S. 112, click here.

Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Commission

No. 337

Argued January 14, 1932
Decided February 29, 1932
285 U.S. 119

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Syllabus

1. Where a corporation selling natural gas locally procures its supply by agreement in interstate commerce from a pipeline company with which it is so affiliated that the two are not at arm’s length in their dealings, the reasonableness of the interstate price is subject to be inquired into by state authority when applied to be the local company for permission to increase its local rate. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 282 U.S. 133. P. 123.

2. A local distributor of natural gas, in a common corporate control with an interstate pipeline company from which it brought its supply in interstate commerce, sought to enjoin the enforcement of a local rate in a particular city which the state commission had declined to increase without proof that the interstate price was reasonable.

Held:

(1) Adjudications upholding the same wholesale rate in relation to other cities of the state, in suits to which the city now in question was not a party, do not make a prima facie case here. P. 125.

(2) Undenied allegations to the effect that the distributor, though it has tried, cannot obtain its supply otherwise or at a lower price than from the pipeline company, that that the same price is charged by that and other lines to other distributors, do not establish the reasonableness of the price in this case in view of the affiliation of the two companies. P. 125.

(3) In view of the relations of the two corporations and the power implicit therein arbitrarily to fix and maintain costs, as respects the distributing company, which do not represent the true value of the service rendered, the state authority is entitled to a fair showing of the reasonableness of such costs, although this may involve a presentation of evidence which would not be required in the case of parties dealing at arm’s length and in the general and open market. P. 126.

Affirmed.

Appeal from a decree of the district court of three judges dismissing a bill to enjoin a state commission and a city from enforcing local rates for gas alleged to have become confiscatory.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options

Title: Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 285 U.S. 119 (1932)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options

Title: Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 285 U.S. 119 (1932)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 285 U.S. 119 (1932) in 285 U.S. 119 285 U.S. 120–285 U.S. 121. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QDPT9E5LMEKYZQ2.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 285 U.S. 119 (1932), in 285 U.S. 119, pp. 285 U.S. 120–285 U.S. 121. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QDPT9E5LMEKYZQ2.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 285 U.S. 119 (1932). cited in 1932, 285 U.S. 119, pp.285 U.S. 120–285 U.S. 121. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QDPT9E5LMEKYZQ2.

General Summary