George A. Fuller Co. v. McCloskey, 228 U.S. 194 (1913)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
George A. Fuller Co. v. McCloskey, 228 U.S. 194 (1913)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 228 U.S. 177, click here.
George A. Fuller Co. v. McCloskey No. 176 Submitted March 7, 1913 Decided April 7, 1913 228 U.S. 194
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Syllabus
The averments in the declaration, when taken together, held sufficient to allow proof of negligence on the part of one defendant, although one specific charge related exclusively to the other defendant as to whom the case was dismissed.
A modification of the requested charge so as to make it conform to the facts of the case, held in this case not to have been error, the jury having been properly instructed by the court on the subject of contributory negligence.
A variance between proof and declaration should be called to the attention of the trial court when the declaration can be met by an immediate amendment.
A contractor erecting a building arranged with another and independent contractor who was putting in the elevator to use and control the elevator and an operator therefor before it was turned over to the owner; he also arranged to allow his own subcontractor painting the elevator shaft to use the elevator and to signal when and where the elevator was to stop to let the employees off and take them on. Held that the contractor was the sole master, and was responsible for damages sustained by an employee of the subcontractor resulting from negligence of the operator in failing to respond to signals properly given by such employee.
35 App.D.C. 595 affirmed.
The facts, which involve the liability of a contractor for personal injuries caused by negligence in operating an elevator, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," George A. Fuller Co. v. McCloskey, 228 U.S. 194 (1913) in 228 U.S. 194 228 U.S. 195–228 U.S. 197. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q92UGBD52MMGTZQ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." George A. Fuller Co. v. McCloskey, 228 U.S. 194 (1913), in 228 U.S. 194, pp. 228 U.S. 195–228 U.S. 197. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q92UGBD52MMGTZQ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in George A. Fuller Co. v. McCloskey, 228 U.S. 194 (1913). cited in 1913, 228 U.S. 194, pp.228 U.S. 195–228 U.S. 197. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q92UGBD52MMGTZQ.
|