135.
Organization
1
Strange to say, the objections raised against us generally
sprang from the belief which had taken root among the men
of past insurrections, and the semi-enlightened classes of the
Peninsula — that unity was an impossible Utopia, and contrary
to the historical tendencies of the Italians.
Facts have now decided this question between me and these
opponents. But at that time, when the opinion against unity
was almost universal among the so-called educated classes;
when all the governments of Europe supported the theory of
Metternich that Italy was a mere "geographical expression";
when the men most noted for their republican principles, revolutionary
aims, and antagonism to existing treaties, were all
partisans of federalism, as the only possible form of national
existence for us Italians; — the causes of doubt and distrust were
numerous indeed. . . .
The truth is that throughout the whole of that period of
European agitation, all intuition of the future was wanting.
The aim of the agitation was liberty above all things.
Few understood that lasting liberty can only be achieved and
maintained in Europe by strong and compact nations, equally
balanced in power, and therefore not liable to be driven to the
necessity of seeking a protecting alliance by guilty concessions;
or led astray by the hope of assistance in territorial questions, to
the point of seeking to ally their liberty with despotism.
Few understood that the association of the nations to promote
the organized and peaceful progress of humanity which they invoked,
was only possible on the condition that those nations
should first have a real and recognized existence.
The compulsory conjunction of different races, utterly devoid
of that unity of faith and moral aim in which true nationality
consists, does not in fact constitute a nation. The division of
Europe, sanctioned in the treaties of 1815, by the excess of power
given to some states, produced a consequent weakness in others,
and placed them in the necessity of leaning upon some one of the
great powers, no matter upon what terms, for support; while the
germs of internal dissension that division had implanted in
the heart of every people had created an insurmountable barrier
to the normal and secure development of liberty.
To reconstruct the map of Europe, then, in accordance with
the special mission assigned to each people by their geographical,
ethnographical, and historical conditions, was the first step necessary
for all.
I believed that the question of the nationalities was destined
to give its name to the century, and restore to Europe that
power of initiative for good, which had ceased, on the conclusion
of the past epoch, by the fall of Napoleon. . . .
I occupied my time, therefore, between the writing of one
article and another, in founding and spreading my secret association.
I sent statutes, instructions, suggestions of every description,
to those young friends I had left behind in Genoa and
Leghorn. There . . . the first congregations were established.
The organization was as simple and as free from symbolism as
it was possible to make it. Rejecting the interminable hierarchy
of Carbonarism,1 the institution had only two grades of rank — the
Initiators and the Initiated.
Those were chosen as Initiators, who, to their devotion to the
principles of the association, added sufficient intelligence and
prudence to justify their being permitted to select new members.
The simply Initiated were not empowered to affiliate.
A central committee existed abroad, whose duties consisted
in holding aloft, as it were, the flag of the association, forging
as many links as possible between the Italian and foreign democratic
element, and generally directing and superintending the
work of the association.
There were also native committees established in the chief
towns of the more important provinces, who managed the practical
details, correspondence, etc.; a director or organizer of the
initiators in each city, and groups of members, unequal in number,
but each headed by an initiator.
Such was the framework of "Young Italy". . . .
All masonic signs of recognition were abolished as dangerous.
A watchword, a piece of paper previously cut into a certain
shape, and a certain fashion of giving the hand, were used to
accredit the messengers sent from the central to the provincial
committees, and vice versa; and these signs were changed every
three months.
Each member was required to bind himself to a monthly contribution
according to his means. Two-thirds of the money
thus collected was retained n the provincial treasuries; one-third
was paid in, or, more correctly speaking, ought to have been
paid in, to the treasury of the central committee, to provide for
the expenses of the general organization. It was calculated that
the expenses of printing would be defrayed by the sale of the
writings.
The symbol of the association was a sprig of cypress, in memory
of our martyrs. Its motto, Ora e sempre, "Now and forever,"
indicated the constancy indispensable for our enterprise.
The banner of "Young Italy," composed of the three Italian
colors,1 bore on the one side the words, LIBERTY, EQUALITY,
HUMANITY; and on the other, UNITY and INDEPENDENCE.
The first indicated the international mission of Italy; the
second, the national.
From the first moment of its existence, GOD and HUMANITY
was adopted as the formula of the association, with regard to its
external relations; while GOD and the PEOPLE was that
chosen in its relations to our own country.
From these two principles, which are in fact the application of
one sole principle to two different spheres, the association deduced
its whole religious, social, political, and individual faith.
"Young Italy" was the first among the political associations
of that day which endeavored to comprehend all the various
manifestations of national life in one sole conception, and to direct
and govern them all from the height of a religious principle
the mission confided by the Creator to his creature — toward
one sole aim, the emancipation of our country and its brotherhood
with free nations.
1 , vol. i, pp. 174–180.
1 The Carbonari had an elaborate and fantastic ritual full of symbols taken
from the Christian Church, as well as from the trade of charcoal-burning.
1 Red, white, and green.