|
Walling v. General Industries Co., 330 U.S. 545 (1947)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Walling v. General Industries Co., 330 U.S. 545 (1947)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 330 U.S. 539, click here.
Walling v. General Industries Co. No. 564 Argued February 10, 11, 1947 Decided March 31, 1947 330 U.S. 545
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. In a suit by the Wage-Hour Administrator to enjoin alleged violations of the overtime compensation requirement of § 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the evidence summarized in the opinion held adequate to support a finding by the district court that certain "operating engineers" who had charge of a power plant in the absence of the chief engineer, supervised the work of firemen and coal passers, received monthly salaries in excess of $200, and enjoyed privileges usually reserved for supervisory employees, were exempted by § 13(a) as employees employed in an "executive" capacity. Pp. 547-550.
2. Where findings of fact made by a district court on conflicting evidence and inferences drawn therefrom are not clearly wrong, they should not be rejected by a circuit court of appeals. P. 550.
3. Upon review of a judgment of a circuit court of appeals on certiorari, the respondent, without filing a cross-petition for certiorari, may seek to sustain the judgment on a ground which the circuit court of appeals rejected as well as upon that which it accepted. P. 547, n. 5.
155 F.2d 711 affirmed.
The Wage-Hour Administrator sued to enjoin alleged violations of the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The District Court held that the employees in question were exempt under § 13(a), and gave judgment for the employer. 60 F.Supp. 549. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed on the ground that the employees in question, though not exempt, had been compensated in accordance with the Act. 155 F.2d 711. This Court granted certiorari. 329 U.S. 704. Affirmed, p. 550.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Walling v. General Industries Co., 330 U.S. 545 (1947) in 330 U.S. 545 330 U.S. 546. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q1IYFFNP8WMV6JL.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Walling v. General Industries Co., 330 U.S. 545 (1947), in 330 U.S. 545, page 330 U.S. 546. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q1IYFFNP8WMV6JL.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Walling v. General Industries Co., 330 U.S. 545 (1947). cited in 1947, 330 U.S. 545, pp.330 U.S. 546. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=Q1IYFFNP8WMV6JL.
|