|
|
Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958)
Perez v. Brownell No. 44 Argued May 1, 1957 Restored to the calendar for reargument June 24, 1957 Reargued October 28, 1957 Decided March 31, 1958 * 356 U.S. 44
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
In proceedings to deport a person born in the United States, the Government denied that he was an American citizen on the ground that, by voting in a Mexican political election and remaining outside of the United States in wartime to avoid military service, he had lost his citizenship under § 401(e) and (j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended. He sued for a judgment declaring him to be a citizen but was denied relief.
Held: It was within the authority of Congress, under its power to regulate the relations of the United States with foreign countries, to provide in § 401(e) that anyone who votes in a foreign political election shall lose his American citizenship, and the judgment is affirmed. Pp. 45-62.
(a) The power of Congress to regulate foreign relations may reasonably be deemed to include a power to deal with voting by American citizens in foreign political elections, since Congress could find that such activities, because they might give rise to serious international embarrassment, relate to the conduct of foreign relations. Pp. 57-60.
(b) Since withdrawal of the citizenship of Americans who vote in foreign political elections is reasonably calculated to effect the avoidance of embarrassment in the conduct of foreign relations, such withdrawal is within the power of Congress, acting under the Necessary and Proper Clause. Pp. 60-62.
(c) There is nothing in the language, the context, the history or the manifest purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment to warrant drawing from it a restriction upon the power otherwise possessed by Congress to withdraw citizenship. P. 58, n. 3.
(d) No opinion is expressed with respect to the constitutionality of § 401(j) relating to persons who remain outside the United States to avoid military service. P. 62.
235 F.2d 364, affirmed.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958) in 356 U.S. 44 356 U.S. 45. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PXPHS5LXQHLFYFZ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958), in 356 U.S. 44, page 356 U.S. 45. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PXPHS5LXQHLFYFZ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958). cited in 1958, 356 U.S. 44, pp.356 U.S. 45. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PXPHS5LXQHLFYFZ.
|