|
Eichel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 245 U.S. 102 (1917)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Eichel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 245 U.S. 102 (1917)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 245 U.S. 89, click here.
Eichel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company No. 571 Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 8, 1917 Decided November 5, 1917 [U.S. Reports citation not yet available]
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Appellant having brought a number of actions against appellee in the district court, all cognizable there because arising under a law of the United States, appellee filed in that court a bill ancillary and dependent in form setting up a partial equitable defense to all the actions and other partial defenses to some, and praying that the whole matter be tried in equity and the legal proceedings enjoined. The bill also showed diversity of citizenship. Relief was decreed accordingly in the district court and circuit court of appeals. Held that the bill was dependent and ancillary, that the jurisdiction to entertain it was referable to that invoked in the actions at law, and that the decree of the circuit court of appeals was therefore reviewable by appeal. Jud.Code, §§ 128, 241.
In a much litigated case, presenting only questions of fact and well settled questions of general law, unaffected by any ruling on any federal question, where the federal courts of two circuits had reached the same conclusions of fact independently, this Court, being satisfied from the record and assignments, examined in the light of the opinion below, that the ruling were so clearly right that the appeal seemed to be taken without reasonable justification, and therefore for delay, sustained a motion to affirm the decree.
241 F. 357 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Eichel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 245 U.S. 102 (1917) in 245 U.S. 102 245 U.S. 103. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PUVUS9NRX3TXDL2.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Eichel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 245 U.S. 102 (1917), in 245 U.S. 102, page 245 U.S. 103. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PUVUS9NRX3TXDL2.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Eichel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 245 U.S. 102 (1917). cited in 1917, 245 U.S. 102, pp.245 U.S. 103. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=PUVUS9NRX3TXDL2.
|